On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:36:29AM -0700, Craig Baird wrote:
> These are one of the latest stock spam variations. I was getting a gazillion
> of these when they first started. I upgraded to the latest copy of
> 70_sare_stocks.cf, and I don't think I've seen one since. Note that you do
> need
You could build a rule that blocks certain subjects. That's what I did.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_
WhiteListSubject.html
-Original Message-
From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 5:40 AM
To: users@sp
Hey All,
I've been running the latest spamd for months now, and it seems to be a
weekly (at least) occurence that all my child processes will fill up and
hang the thing and allow spam to start seeping through.
However, today I woke up to find this error:
Feb 10 08:57:40 quark spamd[66716]: p
Where is the info about how to keep spama from encapsulating and just
have it modify headers with its own insertions.
I've scanned Mail::Spamassassin::Conf
But did not see that sort of stuff coverd there
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Fuhrmann
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:50 PM
> To: Kevin W. Gagel
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: REPOST:Need some help with - EX_IOERR 74
> input/output error
>
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Kevin W. G
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I've been running the latest spamd for months now, and it seems to be a
> weekly (at least) occurence that all my child processes will fill up and
> hang the thing and allow spam to start seeping through.
>
> However, today I wok
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Where is the info about how to keep spama from encapsulating and just
> have it modify headers with its own insertions.
>
> I've scanned Mail::Spamassassin::Conf
> But did not see that sort of stuff coverd there
>
Read the conf docs again. The option you want is:
report_sa
It's absolutely not finished, but attached is a quick perl hack I'm
using to read thru a directory of saved spam (text files), extract
urls and automatically build SA rules for them. It's not debugged
throughly and I have a few more things to add, but I know I'm not the
only person who can use thi
Thanks to Stuart and Daryl for your responses. I think I need to ask a basic
question that I'm sure is a FAQ somewhere that I haven't located yet
(honestly I've hunted!).
How do I run a message through the spamassassin command line to get the
score results on the screen? I tried saving the email
Hi!
I got a very high rating for regular mails sent thru
http://www.intermedia.net/
I know how to reduce the rating and just wanted to report this for rule
improvement.
1.4 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
3.1 RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME Bulk email fingerprint (Outloo
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:36:38AM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote:
> You could build a rule that blocks certain subjects. That's what I did.
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_
> WhiteListSubject.html
Do you have anything for SA 2.61?
With warm regards,
-Pa
Hello Loren,
First thank you for this rule - it helped a lot with catching this kind of
spam.
There is another one, similar to this, but with a word in between Fw: and
name. It looks like this
Subject: Fw: hello aallena
Your rule filters for
Subject: Fw: aallena
where aallena is a reci
Hi,
I am compiling SpamAssassin-3.1.0 on HP-UX 11i, with perl 5.8.8. I have
installed most of perl modules, except these perl modules are not installed
optional module missing: Razor2
optional module missing: Net::Ident
optional module missing: IO::Socket::INET6
optional module missing: IO::Sock
Hi,
do you have version 1.28 of rules_du_jour?
It's the version that added SARE_STOCKS.
Yes I do and I've fiddled around with it and have it working now. One last
question though: at the bottom of the rules_du_jour script, it says:
[ "${SA_RESTART}" ] || \
SA_RESTART="/etc/init.d/spama
Hi,
You just need to modify a bit the regexp:
ALL =~ /\nTo: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).+\nSubject:\s*Fw: (hello)*\1\b/i
That would match both cases. If you want to include another words apart
from "hello" do it with (word1|word2|etc).
Ruben
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Irina [mailto:[EMAIL
I got the answer from BUG4608 at
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4608.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Pad Hosmane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:36 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: error compiling on HP-UX 11i
Hi,
I am compi
I would recommend caution when using such a program. I see lots of spam
that have legitimate URLs sprayed in them as well.
I do think this would be very useful though. Just need to make sure you
look through the rules and remove the good guys.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael
I typically use spamassassin -D < testmessage.
Kris
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SA frequently skipping rules
>
> Thanks to Stuart and Daryl for your responses
Jim Smith wrote:
> Thanks to Stuart and Daryl for your responses. I think I need to ask a basic
> question that I'm sure is a FAQ somewhere that I haven't located yet
> (honestly I've hunted!).
>
> How do I run a message through the spamassassin command line to get the
> score results on the scree
Oops, I sent that too quick.
It should be spamassassin -r < testmessage.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SA frequently skipping rules
>
> Thanks to Stuart and Dar
Title: RE: Xtracting urls from saved spams & making SA rules - xurl001.pl
I think I know a bit about extracting URLs from spam ;)
It is pretty damn complicated. A lot of tricks they play, like www.amazon.com.buy-my-drugs-com.optelnd.net
Then you have hex and decimal links to deal with. A
Hi everyone,
If this shouldn't be posted here I do apologize in advance;
I would like to start catching/storing/redirecting ALL spam messages to an
alternate location (a central folder/box/directory etc..) instead of
discarding them.
In my setup I do NOT house and users, as my box is strictly a
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Matt:
>
>> True.. And that username CAN be specified by spamc -u. Spamc passes it
>> to spamd,
>> spamd uses it when calling SQL.
>>
>>
> Quoting from the SPAMc man page:
>
>>-u username
>>This argument has been semi-obsoleted. To have spamd use
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
> Ok,
>
>> Just do what Matt said and pass the username to spamc with the -u
>> option. It'll do exactly what you want.
>
> I don't understand what Daryl and Matt are saying by the above?
> Remember this is a system wide installation and not just running for my
> acc
The rules you create from a 1 day old spam corpus will be obsolete the
next day for most of these spammers that use daily uri rotation.
I'd stick to SURBL and URIBL queries if I were you.. But then again,
I'm partial :)
D
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[E
Hello Ruben,
Was it you who posted this rule? Sorry if yes and I mentioned Loren's name.
Would not it be
ALL =~ /\nTo: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).+\nSubject:\s*Fw: (?:|hello|hey)*\1\b/i
Please notice the first |, this would fall for "no word" between Fw: and
recipient name.
Thank you for your hel
If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains (currently
about 100) for spam, this is a fairly high traffic server processing about
150,0
Forgive me for not understanding the porn filtering capability of SA. I ran
a new email (www.blarneystone.com/spam/spam2.txt) through the SA filter (I
didn't munge the headers this time). Do I understand it that if an email
like that was sent from a URL not yet blacklisted, it would be scored very
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> If this shouldn't be posted here I do apologize in advance;
>
> I would like to start catching/storing/redirecting ALL spam messages to an
> alternate location (a central folder/box/directory etc..) instead of
> discarding them.
>
> In my setup I do NO
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: General assistance
>
> Am I completely off base in the way I have this all setup? I have
went
> with
> a higher speed HD to increase
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtpd]# spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.7
Spamd running with:
OPTIONS="-L -x -d -u nobody -m 45"
No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
12:20pm up 4:05, 1 user, load average: 9.49, 9.23, 9.23
313 processes: 30
Lisa Casey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > do you have version 1.28 of rules_du_jour?
> >
> > It's the version that added SARE_STOCKS.
>
> Yes I do and I've fiddled around with it and have it working now. One
> last question though: at the bottom of the rules_du_jour script, it
> says:
>
> [ "${SA_RESTART
Ed Russell wrote:
If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains (currently
about 100) for spam, this is a fairly high traffic server pr
Lisa Casey wrote:
>
> I looked in /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour and there is a
> different rules_du_jour which says at the top:
>
> Version 1.28 Added SARE_STOCKS
>
> Great! So I copied it over to /etc/local/sbin and ran it. I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] defang]$ /usr/local/sbin/rules_du_jo
Ed Russell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtpd]# spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.8.7
Spamd running with:
OPTIONS="-L -x -d -u nobody -m 45"
No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
Absolutely do user verification. I can throw out from 20%
Matt:
Did you see my post, I got it working just fine. spamass-milter options
-u -e coupled with the following args for SPAMd made this work...
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m5 -q -x"
The system now _IGNORES_ the user specified when the milter was called,
and _READS_ the to: address and uses that for a
Ed Russell wrote:
>
> No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
You really should consider finding a way to do user verification at the
MTA level. You can greatly reduce your server's load if you don't
accept mail for nonexistent users.
To give you an example, so far today my server has rej
DAve wrote:
> Ed Russell wrote:
> >
> > No user verification or RBL at the MTA level.
>
> Absolutely do user verification. I can throw out from 20% to 80% of my
> traffic depending on the current level of dictionary and Joe-Job
> attacks. Since you are processing ahead of your clients Exchange bo
Thanks again
I will start digging
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: alternate lcoation
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> If this shouldn'
User validation is going to be tough or all but impossible. This box
forwards off the mail to an NT box running SL Mail. There is no easy way to
get a userlist out of this product. In addition the users change daily and
some even use multi-drops.
Ed
-
I think there is some confusion, this box does not act as a gateway to
Exchange. I do not use this product in this scenario, but in others.
Ed
---
Talk is cheap since supply always exceeds demand.
---
Hi,
No, change the $SA_RESTART variable in the config file. That way you
don't have to make the same change every time you update RDJ.
The same goes for the $TRUSTED_RULESETS variable.
OK I see now. Thanks, that got it!
Lisa Casey
Ed Russell wrote:
I think there is some confusion, this box does not act as a gateway to
Exchange. I do not use this product in this scenario, but in others.
I used Exchange as an example, and did state as such. My response made
it apear you were looking for an Exchange solution.
My appolo
Ed Russell wrote:
User validation is going to be tough or all but impossible. This box
forwards off the mail to an NT box running SL Mail. There is no easy way to
get a userlist out of this product. In addition the users change daily and
some even use multi-drops.
You don't need to get a u
- Original Message -
>> I'm not sure it'll be a parameter as only about 7,000
>> messages failed out of 90,000. Unless its some kind of
>> time out... But thats the thing, I don't know what the
>> error 70 means.
>
>look for a file called sysexits.h. there you can get the
>meaning of error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fwiw, the easy way to extract URLs is to write a very short SpamAssassin
plugin that calls the get_uri_list() API on the
Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus object and prints them to stdout.
Let SpamAssassin do all the hard work. ;)
- --j.
Chris Sante
My homework is:
1. Install and configure dnscache.
2. Look into RBL at the MTA.
3. Begin to investigate user authentication at the MTA.
Some questions,
1. Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I know there
are quite a few.
2. Once this is in place shou
Title: RE: SA frequently skipping rules
The problem with writing rules for this, is generating FPs. I mean, I get email slike that from my wife all the time. ;)
I'm sure I'm not the only one who gets them. Well I hope other people don't get them from my wife.
Anway, the presence of bad wo
I did something along that line using postfix and amavisd-new.
amavisd-new should also be able to interface with exim (at least it says
so at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features-mta)
However, you could also have a look at Maia Mailguard. That software
uses a modified version of amavisd-
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Then I've not deduced what addresses are used for users and which
block is allocated to servers...
Fair enough. This conversation started when I pointed out you were
blocking comcast's *entire* network. I did so because you failed to
accept mail properly relayed t
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> >> I'm not sure it'll be a parameter as only about 7,000
> >> messages failed out of 90,000. Unless its some kind of
> >> time out... But thats the thing, I don't know what the
> >> error 70 means.
> >
> >look for a file c
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: General assistance
>
> My homework is:
>
> 1.Install and configure dnscache.
> 2.Look into RBL at the MTA.
> 3.Begin
Ed Russell wrote:
> 1.Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I know
> there are quite a few.
openrbl.org has a reasonably comprehensive list.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Ed Russell wrote:
My homework is:
1. Install and configure dnscache.
2. Look into RBL at the MTA.
3. Begin to investigate user authentication at the MTA.
Some questions,
1. Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I know there
are quite a few.
I have tried
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:23:36AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> fwiw, the easy way to extract URLs is to write a very short SpamAssassin
> plugin that calls the get_uri_list() API on the
> Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus object and prints them to stdout.
>
> Let SpamAssassin do all the hard work.
I don't know Exim to tell you how to do it there, but this would be fairly
trivial with Postfix. Run the mail through SA, and if the X-Spam-Status
header says it is spam, rewrite the destination mailbox. Exchange should
handle it from there.
However: do you REALLY want a common spam mailbox for
> Was it you who posted this rule? Sorry if yes and I mentioned Loren's
name.
>
> Would not it be
> ALL =~ /\nTo: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).+\nSubject:\s*Fw: (?:|hello|hey)*\1\b/i
>
> Please notice the first |, this would fall for "no word" between Fw: and
> recipient name.
It was my rule, Ruben ju
DAve wrote:
> Ed Russell wrote:
> >
> > 2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor?
> > Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to either?
>
> I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely check
> my spam and I have found that bayes, rayzor
> Forgive me for not understanding the porn filtering capability of SA. I
ran
> a new email (www.blarneystone.com/spam/spam2.txt) through the SA filter
(I
> didn't munge the headers this time). Do I understand it that if an email
> like that was sent from a URL not yet blacklisted, it would be sco
Bowie Bailey wrote:
DAve wrote:
Ed Russell wrote:
2. Once this is in place should I re-activate pzyor, dcc or razor?
Is one better than the other? Are there advantages to either?
I use neither, though I think I am in the minority. I routinely check
my spam and I have found that bayes, ray
Yes, that was his rule, I forgot to mention it in my reply :)
Ruben
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: viernes, 10 de febrero de 2006 22:00
> Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Little custom rule
>
> > Was it you who posted thi
I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du Jour. I
see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose from when utilizing
this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones would be safe?
Ed
---
Talk is cheap since supp
OK on this web site http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/ they have a list located
here http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/top-sites-domains which contains info from
http://www.surbl.org/.
I wrote a script to download the list and put into body_checks (postfix) and
reject the message that meet the criteria.
Th
Dave,
What paramters are you using for logging with the caching name server?
I currently use this:
logging {
category lame-servers { null; };
};
Thanks,
Joey
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:28 PM
To: users@spamassas
I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du Jour. I
see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose from when
utilizing
this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones would be safe?
I use these:
SARE_ADULT
SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM
SARE_FRAUD
SARE_HEADER0
SARE_HEA
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Joey wrote:
> Is there a way to use these surbl lists via SA and instead of scoring them
> high, actually have them reject/delete the message for this rule and not
> just score it for tagging?
> I guess I am asking if there is a way to have both delete & ta
Loren Wilton writes:
>
> Also be careful of writing the usual ill thought out and draconian rules
> youself like
>
> body MY_PORN_1/cock/i
> scoreMY_PORN_1100# eliminate evil words!
>
> That works just fine. Unless you maybe have a user or a client named John
> Babcock.
Or to t
So far, here's an update.
The OS is Suse Pro 9.3
I haven't seen any spam messages with ALL_TRUSTED in the headers. I have
seen empty emails with a spam score of zero though and spamd tries to
autolearn those as ham and shows "failed".
The bayes_file_mode is now set to 0777
I'm still getting abou
Joey wrote:
Dave,
What paramters are you using for logging with the caching name server?
I currently use this:
logging {
category lame-servers { null; };
};
Thanks,
Joey
I was speaking of dnscache, the program, not dnscache as in "a cacheing
DNS server". See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns
Ed Russell wrote:
I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du Jour. I
see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose from when utilizing
this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones would be safe?
My experience with SARE has been they try very hard to classi
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> I don't know Exim to tell you how to do it there, but this would be fairly
> trivial with Postfix. Run the mail through SA, and if the X-Spam-Status
> header says it is spam, rewrite the destination mailbox. Exchange should
> handle
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Joey wrote:
>
>>Is there a way to use these surbl lists via SA and instead of scoring them
>>high, actually have them reject/delete the message for this rule and not
>>just score it for tagging?
>>I guess I am asking if there is a
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2.4.21-37.0
Al Bogner wrote:
> My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
> options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
> account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
> like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machin
Original Message
Subject: re: rpm of Spam Assassin
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:23:35 -0600
From: Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steven,
Thanks for the reply re: the rpm build of SpamAssassin 3.1.0. I also
did the build on my system, but I can't find the location of where the
build
Al Bogner wrote:
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with
Hey all.
I've mentioned this before, but is there any way to have SA keep a
scoreboard file, possibly with a parseable list on number of tests
performed.
It wouldn't have to write it every message, but perchance update such a
file every sixty seconds or so.
Useful information could be send
Steven Stern wrote:
> If you can edit sendmail.mc and make a new sendmail configuration, then
> you could install spamass-milter. You can then set a reject condition
> for some spam score.
>
As far as I know cpanel servers use exim and the OP sounds like he is on
a shared hosting account.
--
My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-access to
my
account and maybe I could try out how to delete spam automatically. It
looks
like amavis isn't used on this RedHat machine with kernel 2.4.21-37.
- Original Message -
From: "Al Bogner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:54 PM
Subject: How to delete Spam automatically
> My hoster offers cpanel to configure spamassassin, which has only a few
> options to configure, like white and blacklist. But I have shell-a
Matt Kettler wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is passed to spamd as "hfc"
Since I am running spamassassin site wide, and I have a number of domains hitting this mail server, I really need to have the entire email address represented...Here is what my database looks like:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey All,
I've been running the latest spamd for months now, and it seems to be a
weekly (at least) occurence that all my child processes will fill up and
hang the thing and allow spam to start seeping through.
However, today I woke up to find this error:
Feb
Last December, my isp upgraded to spamassassin 3.1.0.
Immediately, DCC and Razor stopped working. So to my
user_prefs I added:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
Now "spamassassin --lint --debug" shows:
[11384] dbg: plugin: loading Mai
> Immediately, DCC and Razor stopped working. So to my
> user_prefs I added:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
user_prefs is too late. You are loading the plugins after the rules have
already been processed and ignored because the
From: "Ed Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If everyone would indulge me I would like to put forth the setup I am
utilizing and get some feedback. I have a box that I have been using for
some time which acts as a pass-through filter for many domains (currently
about 100) for spam, this is a fairly
I think you are confused as to how I have set this up. Qmail-scanner is my
replacement qmail queue. Qmail simply receives mail from the outside world,
then passes it to qmail-scanner for processing. Qmail-scanner initiates
spamd which scans the mail and off it goes. From there procmail will loo
On Friday, February 10, 2006, 1:53:19 PM, Joey Joey wrote:
> OK on this web site http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/ they have a list located
> here http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/top-sites-domains which contains info from
> http://www.surbl.org/.
> I wrote a script to download the list and put into body_c
No, Ed, qmail-scanner should not initiate spamd. It should use spamc to
call the already running spamd. I hope that is what you mean. That is
what stood the hairs on end. It made me wonder if you really knew what
was going on. {o.o}
And seriously, if you are using procmail it's perhaps better to
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Hi Yousef,
>
>
> >
> > I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> > not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
> > in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
> > To this:
> > [ "${CURL_OPT
89 matches
Mail list logo
