Hi all,
I consider creating a local cache of njabl.org using rbldnsd. I can
rsync their zones-information to my server, but their
installation-instructions (http://combined.njabl.org/rsync.html) tell me
that I get dnsbl.njabl.org. That's of littel benefit, since SpamAssassin
accesses combined
On Sunday, October 9, 2005, 5:13:55 AM, Patrick Hagen wrote:
> I consider creating a local cache of njabl.org using rbldnsd. I can
> rsync their zones-information to my server, but their
> installation-instructions (http://combined.njabl.org/rsync.html) tell me
> that I get dnsbl.njabl.org. That'
Jeff Chan schrieb:
[...]
The zone data for both zones is in their rsync directory. The
dynablock data is in the rbldns.dynablock.easynet.nl file, so you
would modify your rbldnsd config:
I was confused about the filename and ignored
rbldns.dynablock.easynet.nl. The njabl-Homepage mentioned that
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 09:41 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 18:15 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
> > Gregory P. Ennis schrieb:
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > I upgraded from 3.0.3 to 3.1.0 and have had a bunch of problems. I
> > > finally got a good install, but could not
Idiot me, upgraded to 3.1 when barely had 3.0.4 working (shooting
self in foot).
Now getting no markup again.
--lint is mum as to any problems, but debug has several "thoughts"
on the matter. I was wondering what was required for SA to run
and whether or not it would be helpful to "pre-req'ed"
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 01:20:10PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> [21132] warn: _(Can't locate object method "header" via package
> "Mail::DomainKeys::Message"
Hrm. What version of Mail::DomainKeys are you folks
installing? The error indicates that a function that should be in
Mail::DomainKeys
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> I'd open up a bugzilla ticket (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org) about this.
Oh, in the meantime I'd consider just disabling the plugin to avoid getting
the error message, until a solution is implemented.
--
Randomly Generated Ta
On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:44 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 01:20:10PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > [21132] warn: _(Can't locate object method "header" via package
> > "Mail::DomainKeys::Message"
>
> Hrm. What version of Mail::DomainKeys are you folks
> installing?
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 13:00 -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:44 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 01:20:10PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > [21132] warn: _(Can't locate object method "header" via package
> > > "Mail::DomainKeys::Message"
> >
> > Hrm. Wh
Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> I updated two very similar Woody machines that day, and this machine
> was trouble -- for some reason dist-upgraded removed a number of
> packages for a reason I'm not clear on. (Like Apache and Bind!)
>
OT and probably too late, but in case anyone else's planning to do t
LA Walsh a écrit :
Idiot me, upgraded to 3.1 when barely had 3.0.4 working (shooting
self in foot).
Now getting no markup again.
--lint is mum as to any problems, but debug has several "thoughts"
on the matter. I was wondering what was required for SA to run
and whether or not it would be hel
some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This causes
AWL to put a significant negative score.
Is there any way to fight these (other than disabling awl)?
when I see:
From: "Wilda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nobody I know calls me Wilda (and if they do, they'd better first send
an a
Rod,
good idea.
I should have mentioned - the upgrade was over a month ago - at which time
I migrated the bayes db.
Perhaps I can export/import the bayes db, and see if it changes the outcome.
my gut feel is the even if the spam db is different, the new spamassassin/bayes
behaves different
13 matches
Mail list logo
