I would gladly block that 38.113.3.xx address in postfix like I blocked
those other 2000 ip-segments but.. they are not the actual sender. They
relay it to spambots I think:
Received: from 127ppp11.telegraph.spb.ru (127ppp11.telegraph.spb.ru
[213.158.11.127])
by *** (Postfix) with ESMTP id
Is the mail being filtered correctly, and you are seeing SA headers on spam,
but not on ham? Or do you also have reason to believe that the mail isn't
being filtered correctly?
Some glue agents do their own version of SA headers, and may not feel the
need to install headers on ham. Qmail may be
Hi all,
I have a special problem with my qmail configure. In this case no
tagging works, but the header lines appear normally so far I saw in the
mail source.
I have qmail installed from the site lifewithqmail.org.
In my /var/qmail/users/assign file I have mixed entries like
=domain.tld-pos
Postfix comes free with any OSX 10.3 or higher. In 10.2 you get
Sendmail.
http://www.messagepartners.com/products/mpp_free_edition.html
Interfaces SA and Clamav with Postfix and others on OS X.
Been using it for 2 months now, with CommuniGate Pro as Mail server.
Good product.
I wrote a how-
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give
strong negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a
"clean" or re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Dr Robert Young wrote:
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give strong
negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a "clean" or
re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
man spamassassin
--remove-addr-from-whitelist=addr Remove
Hi,
Recently I've noticed at lot of spammer emails in html format containg
entries like:
perfume
The text/word in the SPAN tags is random Has anyone implemented a rule
to assign a high score for messages, which matches this pattern (with the
"display: none" style) ??
Regards,
/Brian
Title: Spam Phone number
Hi All,
I have been receiving lots of spam with something like the following. Would it be possible to get this phone number added to Evil Numbers? The phone number always seems to be the same, but the extension is always changing.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers
Brian Ipsen wrote:
Recently I've noticed at lot of spammer emails in html format containg
entries like:
perfume
The text/word in the SPAN tags is random Has anyone implemented a rule
to assign a high score for messages, which matches this pattern (with the
"display: none" style) ??
I u
Dr Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 07/17/2005 01:23:37 PM:
> Just as an update to those who have an interest,
>
> gcc 4.0 and higher will cause problems with milter-spamc release
> 0.25. The configure script puts in params that changed between gcc
> 3.x and 4.x (specifically the -f
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:54:12PM +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
> full local_DISPLAY_NONE /\bdisplay\s?:\s?none\b/i
> describe local_DISPLAY_NONE Style with "display: none" CSS attribute
> score local_DISPLAY_NONE 2.0
Ewww! At least do rawbody. Here's a rule of thumb: if you think you
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:25:38 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Is the mail being filtered correctly, and you are seeing SA headers on spam,
> > but not on ham? Or do you also have reason to believe that the mail isn't
> > being filtered correctly?
> >
> > So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --- Forwarded Message
> Date:Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:59:55 +0200
> From:[asf sysadmins]
> Subject: Re: whitelisting mistaken SORBS DUL listing locally?
>
> --On July 14, 2005 12:36:23 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I
John Wilcock wrote:
Brian Ipsen wrote:
Recently I've noticed at lot of spammer emails in html format containg
entries like:
perfume
The text/word in the SPAN tags is random Has anyone implemented a
rule
to assign a high score for messages, which matches this pattern (with the
"displa
David Brodbeck wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
1) Segregate dynamic IPs into one netblock, static IPs into another.
I think as we get closer and closer to running out of IPv4 addresses,
this is going to get less and less common. A lot of places can no
longer afford to have IPs sitting around unused
On Monday, Jul 11th 2005 at 16:28 -0700, quoth Justin Mason:
=>fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
=>http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
=>
=>totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is the
=>case.
=>
=>--j.
=>
I'm running FC4 here and I thought I'd look.
In my /usr/li
Loren Wilton wrote:
Is the mail being filtered correctly, and you are seeing SA headers on spam,
but not on ham? Or do you also have reason to believe that the mail isn't
being filtered correctly?
Some glue agents do their own version of SA headers, and may not feel the
need to install headers
I've had a couple of these since upgrading to 3.0.4. Headers with NO IP
address in it, just this:
Received: from localhost by (our server)
I assume that if it's not a bug on my end, some users and/or servers are
sending out from 127.0.0.1, which in turn sets off:
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
anyone know what this nabble.com site is? it appears to be a mailing list
archive of the users list, but I've never heard of it. (the edit is
already reverted -- the wiki front page is not the appropriate place for
this.)
- --j.
- --- Forwarded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
btw, I was just rereading this -- an interesting approach you might
want to experiment with, is having *two* boundaries. ie:
negative scores positive scores
<|---|---
On Jul 18, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Dr Robert Young wrote:
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give
strong negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a
"clean" or re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
You've already asked this question and we've alread
Hello dennis,
Friday, July 15, 2005, 10:08:56 PM, you wrote:
dsc> Ah, here is the From header:
dsc> From: 360° Skin Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dsc> Not 6 digits, but maybe the degree symbol is contributing. I'll advise not
dsc> to start the username with 360°.
Actually, that header is
> From: =?is
Justin,
Do you have suggestions on how I should come up with the two boundary
lines and what do I do with the "unsure" messages?
I'm all ears.
Joe
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
btw, I was just rereading this -- an interesting approach you might
want t
23 matches
Mail list logo
