At 09:16 PM 5/9/2005, you wrote:
I'm testing the SA but my server can't connect to outside world. Thus,
i've to send mail from localhost to myself to find how accurate SA is.
Unfortunately, SA don't scan mails that sent from localhost.
how can I reconfig it to scan every mail.
You don't. You tell
On Monday, May 9, 2005, 8:50:43 AM, John Stewart wrote:
> Hmmm... I just re-installed SpamCopURI 0.25. Still the same deal. Also tried
> upgrading Net::DNS, but still no hits on the email containing this bad URL.
> I am running an old perl... 5.6.0. Perhaps is it critical to be running
> 5.8.2?
>
>> Surely they should both give exactly the same result?
>
> Maybe.. Depends a LOT on the options you pass to spamd when you start it.
Yes you're right - there's an error in the scripts on Bill Shupps
shupp.org site which I used to make my box - it was calling spamd with
-L for some reason. I exp
* Evan Platt wrote (10/05/2005 05:21):
> At 09:16 PM 5/9/2005, you wrote:
>>I'm testing the SA but my server can't connect to outside world. Thus,
>>i've to send mail from localhost to myself to find how accurate SA is.
>>Unfortunately, SA don't scan mails that sent from localhost.
>>
>>how can I
Yes, you're right.
I have just solved my first problem. Now, I can send e-mails via php and
they are scanned by SA. My solution is using another computer to send
e-mails across private lan.
I'm trying to solve the second problem. It is how to send an e-mail with a
fake header that is as like as he
I can found only Bayes.pm and method tokenize that
is used when learning an e-mail.
I want to know which file that is used to compute
Bayes score for incomming mail
Thanks
Heng
If you look at the following output of "top" you will see that some
spamd processes runs under the ownership of "spamd" and others under
"root". I would like to know why?
16930 root 9 0 37908 37M 16548 S18.7 0.9 0:10 spamd
16927 root 11 0 83720 81M 16296 S10.7 2.1 0
Hi,
this spam jumped through my surbl rules
(see below)
They obviously used hex for the .(dot)
- smart way to get around surbl.
I am running sa 2.63 (I know, I need
to upgrade), but is this likely fixed in newer releases ?
regards
Scott Farrell
Phone: 02-9411 3622 Mobile: 0412 927 156
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 5:12:12 AM, sub sub wrote:
> Hi,
> this spam jumped through my surbl rules (see below)
> They obviously used hex for the .(dot) - smart way to get around surbl.
> I am running sa 2.63 (I know, I need to upgrade), but is this likely fixed
> in newer releases ?
My SA 2.
How to turn off this warning?
I'm using centos 4.0
[root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n
LANG="en_US"
SUPPORTED="en_US:en"
[root]# sa-learn --ham Ham-sample
Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182.
TIA
Hi all,
I'm using postfix, spampd and SA (system wide). Any idea how to move all
mail mark as spam to specifix mailbox so sombody could inspect the
message and release or delete after feed it to sa-learn?
Tks.
--
--beast
Hello,
I’ve got three SA 3.0 servers that I maintain. Is
it possible to use one server to update the baysian DB’s on the other 2
servers? Or even copy them over to the other 2 servers?
Thanks
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice
If the information in
Johnson, S wrote:
Hello,
I’ve got three SA 3.0 servers that I maintain. Is it possible to use
one server to update the baysian DB’s on the other 2 servers? Or even
copy them over to the other 2 servers?
Thanks
=-
Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the
spam I can possibly get?
Thanks
Disclaimer for the disclaimer:
I by no means authorized the following disclaimer, but
thanks to our state government we are required to attach to all outbound
emails. J
Post your e-mail address to some public newsgroups, get yourself active on
anyplace that posts live e-mail addresses, if you built it (your name
everywhere) they (spammers) will come.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
810-794-4400
Johnson, S wrote:
> An
Johnson, S a écrit :
Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
possibly get?
Thanks
Disclaimer for the disclaimer:
I by no means authorized the following disclaimer, but thanks to our
state government we are required to attach to all outboun
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 7:59:20 AM, S Johnson wrote:
> Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
> possibly get?
> Thanks
IIRC the CDT study found that putting addresses on web sites was
a very effective way to get them spammed:
http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319
One think I have found effective:
Get permission to redirect e-mail from a client's former employees where
that employee's address receives a ton of spam.
I've gotten such permission from my client and I redirect that person's
e-mail to my own box. Normally, such boxes of former employee would e
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 15:59, Johnson, S typed:
> Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
> possibly get?
If you get a spam that has a link to a page for opting out, opt-out a
spamtrap :)
Also look for invalid local addresses that get rejected. If they will never
ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnson, S wrote:
| Anyone know the best way to subscribe to receive all the spam I can
| possibly get?
|
|
| Thanks
A foolproof way used by the 419 eaters used to be:
1) search in google for "MUGU GUYMAN"
2) post a message in the resulting guestbook
I’m looking at creating an email address to capture spam and only
be used for spam. Since I can be guaranteed that all email I received to this
address is spam, is there a way to weigh this higher in the sa-learn?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice
If th
If you look at the following output of "top" you will see that some
spamd processes runs under the ownership of "spamd" and others under
"root". I would like to know why?
16930 root 9 0 37908 37M 16548 S18.7 0.9 0:10 spamd
16927 root 11 0 83720 81M 16296 S10.7 2.1 0:
> Get permission to redirect e-mail from a client's former employees where
> that employee's address receives a ton of spam.
This will NOT work.
Receiving a spam after it has been forwarded is NOT the same as
receiving the SPAM directly from the spammer. All the headers will be
replaced with leg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johnson, S wrote:
>
>
> Im looking at creating an email address to capture spam and only be
> used for spam. Since I can be guaranteed that all email I received to
> this address is spam, is there a way to weigh this higher in the sa-learn?
>
Spam i
> The only way to properly forward a spam is to forward it as an RFC822
> attachment and then unattach it at the receiving end. But I
> expect this
> is more hassle than you wanted...
If you are using Exchange and you set your account to receive the email for
that user. Then you should get the e
At 12:04 PM 5/10/2005, Johnson, S wrote:
I'm looking at creating an email address to capture spam and only be used
for spam. Since I can be guaranteed that all email I received to this
address is spam, is there a way to weigh this higher in the sa-learn?
No. Although exhaustive or weighted train
Nick,
You make some good points which I'm sure others might need to know.
In MY case, it doesn't matter because (1) I don't use bayes, (2) I'm
forwarding between accounts on the SAME mail server and it happens to just
copy the message file to the other folder WITHOUT adding additional headers.
R
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Have you tried spamassassin -D < some_message and spamassassin
> --lint?
SA lints fine... running it in debug mode, it appears to not be checking
anything but the multi records. See below.
I've grepped through /usr/share/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassasin, and
the only URI
> Get permission to redirect e-mail from a client's former employees where
> that employee's address receives a ton of spam.
Also, I've just checked a former employee's account who hasn't worked
here for a year or soa lot of the mail sitting in their mailbox isn't SPAM.
It also included:
-Mail
I've been running with bayes in a MySQL database for a while now, and I
need to start dealing with cleaning up users who are no longer here. I
also have AWL and configuration in the database.
So, I think I'm looking at something like the following to delete
someone's data from the database:
1. De
>Also, I've just checked a former employee's
Good points, Nick.
Well, in that case, I'd go with Nick's suggestion that this is NOT a good
way to build a spamtrap or bayes training corpus. But it still might be
effective for "personal" use where an administrator would personally
evaluate such mail
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Tim Bishop wrote:
> I've been running with bayes in a MySQL database for a while now, and I
> need to start dealing with cleaning up users who are no longer here. I
> also have AWL and configuration in the database.
>
> So, I think I'm looking at something
I
have problems with my client outlook97. Spamassassin adds some lines to the
headed one of the mail,
which
generate that my client cannot lower the mail and by consequence they block
my count POP3.
I
have spamassassin 2.64.
The
email are Spam, and the bayesiano does not identify them lik
Everyone would agree that if the sending server's IP address is listed on a
respected RBL like SpamHaus, there is a very high percentage chance that
that message is spam. (not that other additional testing shouldn't be
done... but, looking at this alone, at least 99.9+% of the time, the message
is
Nick Gilbert wrote:
Also, I've just checked a former employee's account who hasn't worked
here for a year or soa lot of the mail sitting in their mailbox isn't SPAM.
So reusing an old mailbox and assuming it must all be spam I would say
is a very bad idea.
===8<---
header JD_USATODAY_1From =~ /e\.usatoday\.com/i
describe JD_USATODAY_1 usatoday.com - SAY WHAT?
score JD_USATODAY_1 300
body JD_USATODAY_2 /e\.usatoday\.com/i
describe JD_USATODAY_2 I never joined dummies
score JD_USATODAY_2 300
===8<---
Somebody at that "media" place
From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johnson, S wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm looking at creating an email address to capture spam and only be
> > used for spam. Since I can be guaranteed that all email I received to
> > this address is spam, is
jdow wrote:
===8<---
header JD_USATODAY_1From =~ /e\.usatoday\.com/i
describe JD_USATODAY_1 usatoday.com - SAY WHAT?
score JD_USATODAY_1 300
body JD_USATODAY_2 /e\.usatoday\.com/i
describe JD_USATODAY_2 I never joined dummies
score JD_USATODAY_2 300
===8<---
Somebody at that "med
From: "Steve Prior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jdow wrote:
>
> > ===8<---
> > header JD_USATODAY_1From =~ /e\.usatoday\.com/i
> > describe JD_USATODAY_1 usatoday.com - SAY WHAT?
> > score JD_USATODAY_1 300
> >
> > body JD_USATODAY_2 /e\.usatoday\.com/i
> > describe JD_USATODAY_2 I never
Hello list
I am having an issue with bayes. I'm using MailScanner which invokes
Mail:SpamAssassin (a mix of 3.0.3 and 3.0.2). This is being ran off an LVS
cluster consisting of 3 real servers. I have been able to get bayes to use
MySQL so all the nodes can share the same bayes db. This has bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow wrote:
| From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Johnson, S wrote:
|>
|>>
|>>I'm looking at creating an email address to capture spam and only be
|>>used for spam. Since I can be guaranteed
From: forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Yes, you're right.
> I have just solved my first problem. Now, I can send e-mails via php and
> they are scanned by SA. My solution is using another computer to send
> e-mails across private lan.
>
> I'm trying to solve the second problem. It is how to se
jdow wrote:
>Odd, I typed that correctly in the user_prefs and transcribed it
>wrong here.
>header JD_FROM_DRUG_1 From =~ /(viagra|cialis| soma)\b/i
>
JD - performance suggestion. When doing a (a|b) type construct, add ?:
to disable backreferences. It saves some memory and speeds the regex
execu
forum wrote:
> I can found only Bayes.pm and method tokenize that is used when
> learning an e-mail.
> I want to know which file that is used to compute Bayes score for
> incomming mail
>
> Thanks
> Heng
1) why do you care?
2) look further into bayes.pm at sub compute_prob_for_token and sub sc
Martin G. Diehl wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded ... you helped me think it through.
Greetings,
I am seeing some SpamAssassin eMail messages flagged as SPAM.
That's probably not unusual, given the nature of our discussions and
especially because we quote actual SPAM examples within our messa
Nick Gilbert wrote:
>>>Surely they should both give exactly the same result?
>>>
>>>
>>Maybe.. Depends a LOT on the options you pass to spamd when you start it.
>>
>>
>
>Yes you're right - there's an error in the scripts on Bill Shupps
>shupp.org site which I used to make my box - it was
Thomas Cameron wrote:
so I whitelist on: List-Id:
Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
All that I was able to find out is that it locally coding and is part
of the user login.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Martin G. Diehl
jdow wrote:
Kindly explain to me how I can perform that nice bounce trick when I am
using fetchmail, Steve. I'd LOVE to do that.
Unfortunatly you can't. You only have one shot to reject the email from
the spammer and that is when the spammers machine is connecting to yours
to deliver the message.
Phibee Network operation Center wrote:
> Hi
>
> i use SpamAssassin 3.0.1 on a qmail/qmail-scanner 1.25st.
> i have my list into personnal.cf
>
> my problems that is SpamAssassin see my instruction:
>
> header PERSO_SUJET_18 Subject =~ /New! Vìagra soft/i
> score PERSO_SUJET_18 3
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: *SPAM* SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl <[EMAIL PROTE
I think I've exhausted my search on Google and the archives for this list.
I have an ISP that does SpamAssassin for my email, which then I download via
POP3.
I use Outlook 2000, which I know can filter the emails too other folders,
etc, based on the SA headers.
What I would like to be able too d
Chris Hale wrote:
> I use Outlook 2000, which I know can filter the emails too other
> folders, etc, based on the SA headers.
>
> What I would like to be able too do, is see the score in it's own
> separate column (preferable that could be sorted by).
You could use Outlook's "Categories" feature.
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:13:36PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> > I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 with Razor2 (agent 2.61).
>
> Not 2.67? So no whiplash (version 8) signatures... very odd...
Whiplash was added in 2.61, fyi.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Nothing takes the taste out of pean
From: "Steve Prior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jdow wrote:
>
> >
> > Kindly explain to me how I can perform that nice bounce trick when I am
> > using fetchmail, Steve. I'd LOVE to do that.
>
> Unfortunatly you can't. You only have one shot to reject the email from
> the spammer and that is when the s
At 09:28 PM 5/9/2005, you wrote:
At 09:16 PM 5/9/2005, you wrote:
I'm testing the SA but my server can't connect to outside world. Thus,
i've to send mail from localhost to myself to find how accurate SA is.
Unfortunately, SA don't scan mails that sent from localhost.
how can I reconfig it to sca
Chris Hale wrote:
>
I think I've exhausted my search on Google and the archives for this list.
I have an ISP that does SpamAssassin for my email, which then I download via
POP3.
I use Outlook 2000, which I know can filter the emails too other folders,
etc, based on the SA headers.
What I would like
Chris Hale wrote:
I think I've exhausted my search on Google and the archives for this list.
I have an ISP that does SpamAssassin for my email, which then I download via
POP3.
Can you control your own userprefs file on the ISP? If so, add the
score as part of the "subject rewrite" rule [or whatev
> I'm trying to solve the second problem. It is how to send an e-mail with a
> fake header that is as like as header of real mail.
> Can you help me to solve this problem. Is there any program that can send
an
> e-mail with header that i can chose.
IS there any reason you absolutely have to use a
> I use Outlook 2000, which I know can filter the emails too other folders,
> etc, based on the SA headers.
>
> What I would like to be able too do, is see the score in it's own separate
> column (preferable that could be sorted by).
>
> Does anybody have a COM add-in or VBScript to do this?
If yo
> Knowing the SPAMassassin score might not help ... why do you expect to
find any
> correlation bwetween score and either false positives and false
negativews?
>
> I have some messages from the SPAMassassin lists that got analyzed
> (somehow, my whitelist settings got ignored sometimes) -- and of t
61 matches
Mail list logo
