Hi
I am currently conducted an experiment to test the accuracy of spamassassin.
Having conducted one experiment I need to re-run the it. I just wanted to
know how to delete the data that
has been stored by the bayes component of the filter. Would you know how to
do this? (I am using spamassassin
We allow user rules. (Please don't argue with me about this. It's a very
small site and yes, we do trust our users.)
The following are in my .spamassassin/user_prefs
header CF_SUB_UID Subject =~ /vlb|Vicki/i
score CF_SUB_UID4.0
describe CF_SUB_UID Subje
From: "Vicki Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We allow user rules. (Please don't argue with me about this. It's a very
> small site and yes, we do trust our users.)
>
> The following are in my .spamassassin/user_prefs
> header CF_SUB_UID Subject =~ /vlb|Vicki/i
> score CF_SUB_UID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow writes:
> From: "Vicki Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > We allow user rules. (Please don't argue with me about this. It's a very
> > small site and yes, we do trust our users.)
> >
> > The following are in my .spamassassin/user_prefs
> > header
Hello FH,
Monday, February 14, 2005, 11:30:14 AM, you wrote:
F> Thanks for the help/pointers :D So where are these other FAQs?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
F> I think I need a good crash course on how/where to setup custom rules
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin
Hello Atif,
Monday, February 14, 2005, 5:29:34 PM, you wrote:
AM> Hi
AM> I am currently conducted an experiment to test the accuracy of spamassassin.
AM> Having conducted one experiment I need to re-run the it. I just wanted to
AM> know how to delete the data that
AM> has been stored by the baye
Thanks! I am learning every day.
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch
"For by him were all things created, that are in
heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible,
whether they be thrones, or domi
Hello!
I use spamassassin-3.01 in site-wide mode (spamd+spamc) on Linux
Slackware-9.1 mail server.
Everything worked just fine - about 300 spam-letters dayly was filtered.
But then I made system to look up mail-users in ldap database. And
removed accounts from linux system.
Now spamc can't check
Sorry, mistake, must be
"3000 spam-letters dayly was filtered."
--
Andrew.
Title: [OT] Spam Quarantine
Hi List.
Sorry to post this here but I am stumped as where to look.
I am looking for webmail software which can be a frontend to
A catchall for spam.
Basically I would like to login via the web and release messages.
Also, a once-a-day digest would be great.
At 12:07 AM 2/15/2005, you wrote:
Hi List.
Sorry to post this here but I am stumped as where to look.
I am looking for webmail software which can be a frontend to
A catchall for spam.
Basically I would like to login via the web and release messages.
Also, a once-a-day digest would be great.
Thanks
Thomas
being a MailScanner user myself.
I'd say, use that and a couple of little extras called MailWatch and
Quarantinereport.
Head over to the MailScanner list and we'll you all the details :-)
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Thomas King
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote:
| Hi List.
|
| Sorry to post this here but I am stumped as where to look.
|
| I am looking for webmail software which can be a frontend to
| A catchall for spam.
|
| Basically I would like to login via the web an
Good
two projects for him to evaluate. Should give Thomas a nice choice.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Robert LeBlanc wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote:
| Hi List.
|
| Sorry to post t
Hi All.
Thanks for the responses.
Maia seems extremely cool, just wish there were some screenshots to look
at.
Definetely seems like a good way to go considering the platforms I am
currently running on.
Thanks again
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote:
| Maia seems extremely cool, just wish there were some screenshots to look
| at.
| Definetely seems like a good way to go considering the platforms I am
| currently running on.
Maia was featured in the December i
Hello all,
I am searching for a way to use an external test in Spamassassin. E.g. I
want to have a simple bash script which is called by SA every time a
mail is checked. This external program returns an return code which SA
uses for testing purposes.
Perhaps this is very simple by having a simp
Hello, all.
May be useful for someone... Little tool SpamdMon on clear C for Linux.
It works fine for me on my busy production servers, which used
daemonize version of SpamAssassin. You know, hangup sometimes
happens with SA.
http://user.rol.ru/~kurmanin/projects/
Feedback are
This is the header from a message I sent myself from my Yahoo account. I leads
to two questions:
1. How reliable is the "forged" test?
2. Is there a test for verifying domain keys?
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90102.mail.scd.yahoo.com
[66.218.94.
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
>>OK, looks good. SA puts preferences and AWL data and >>Bayes data files in ~/.spamassassin/ by default.
I am sorry if my qs sounds little bit funny but as i am new so i have some confusions.
Here my qs. is when a mail is coming to the server , suppose, for *user2* o
At 06:04 AM 2/15/2005, Manuel Schmitt (manitu) wrote:
I am searching for a way to use an external test in Spamassassin. E.g. I
want to have a simple bash script which is called by SA every time a mail
is checked. This external program returns an return code which SA uses for
testing purposes.
P
At 02:12 AM 2/15/2005, Andrew Afliatunov wrote:
I use spamassassin-3.01 in site-wide mode (spamd+spamc) on Linux
Slackware-9.1 mail server.
Everything worked just fine - about 300 spam-letters dayly was filtered.
But then I made system to look up mail-users in ldap database. And removed
accounts
Tinni wrote:
> Here my qs. is when a mail is coming to the server , suppose, for
> *user2* or many others, will the spamassassin check the mails for
> ham/spam with the *default* database which is bydefault set to
> *user1* ? or it will check only for the mails of *user1* ? I am
> little bit conf
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:18:47PM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote:
>
> Additional info on this bug:
Being a bit surprised about the lack of interest in a bug like this here,
I'm trying to submit something to this 'bugzilla'. I've made an account
and now it suggest reading the guidelines.
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Matias,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 5:32:10 AM, you wrote:
MLB> The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the
MLB> Bayesian filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam
MLB> and ham, or more ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn the spam
MLB> folde
Hi,
I run spamassassin from procmail using the following in my .procmailrc:
# Spam Assassiin and other spam filtering
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
I'm using a debian package install - spamassassin 3.0.2-0.backports.org
I also use rules_du_jour in a my_rules_du_jour style and have
At 11:35 AM 2/15/2005, Chris Withers wrote:
I'm using a debian package install - spamassassin 3.0.2-0.backports.org
I also use rules_du_jour in a my_rules_du_jour style and have the
following trusted rule sets:
TRUSTED_RULESETS="BIGEVIL TRIPWIRE ANTIDRUG EVILNUMBERS";
Please don't use antidrug.cf
Matt Kettler wrote:
TRUSTED_RULESETS="BIGEVIL TRIPWIRE ANTIDRUG EVILNUMBERS";
Please don't use antidrug.cf with SA 3.0 or higher.. SA 3.0 already has
antidrug as a part of the standard ruleset, and the second .cf is a waste.
Aha, OK.
I'd also strongly suggest switching over to enabling network tes
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:18:47PM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote:
> >
> > Additional info on this bug:
>
> Being a bit surprised about the lack of interest in a bug
> like this here,
> I'm trying to submit something to this 'bugzilla'. I've
> made an account
> and now it suggest readi
At 12:03 PM 2/15/2005, Chris Withers wrote:
> I'd also strongly suggest switching over to enabling network tests and
disabling bigevil.. Much lower overhead.
Can you explain how I make that switch or refer me to any relevent docs?
Really, all you need to do is make sure Net::DNS is installed.. SA
Why am I getting around 20 lines of this in a spamassassin --lint -D:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0xa89414c)
inhibited further callbacks
What is URIDNSBL and what is this error?
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:27:39PM +0100, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
>
> From reading your messages, I wouldn't be sure if it is a bug in spamd
> itself. It could very well be in either the Perl-version or related modules
> your are using. Some are actually quite old and have known
At 12:38 PM 2/15/2005, Austin Weidner wrote:
Why am I getting around 20 lines of this in a spamassassin --lint -D:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0xa89414c)
inhibited further callbacks
What is URIDNSBL and what is this error?
It's not an error, it's a debugging information
Hi folks,
I ahve a pretty wierd problem here and cannot figure out why.
Here is my system:
SuSe 9.2
Postfix 2.0.19
SpamAssassin 2.64
SA is runnung as deamon, and postfix is connecting correctly to the
assigned TCP port.
Here is what happens:
SA gets the mail and checks it nicely. However, applyin
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:22:01PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0xa89414c)
> >inhibited further callbacks
>
> It's not an error, it's a debugging informational message only.. It's
> highly important to plugin writing and debugging, but oth
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 07:30:33PM +0100, Daniel Draes wrote:
> Any ideas whats wrong with my setup?
My guess is that you're running the message through SpamAssassin twice. The
first time marks it up appropriately, then the second time sees a
substantially different message and marks it up differ
At 01:30 PM 2/15/2005, Daniel Draes wrote:
Here is what happens:
SA gets the mail and checks it nicely. However, applying points to the
mail seems to fail somehow. For example I have mails where the subjects
will be rewritten according my confing with '*SPAM*' but the
SA-Spam-Status Flag
Hi,
Usually that means the message has been double-scanned..
First at the MTA layer, where it got tagged as spam and encapsulated.
The encapsulation also winds up creating new headers for the message.
The second time it got called at the MDA layer (ie: procmail) and the
new headers resulted in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Weidner writes:
> Why am I getting around 20 lines of this in a spamassassin --lint -D:
>
> debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0xa89414c)
> inhibited further callbacks
>
> What is URIDNSBL and what is this error?
that's
>surbl.org is the biggest source of URIDNSBLs.
Is there another? :)
--Chris (Oh no! We're the Microsoft of URIDNSBLs! All your domains are
belong to us!)
>> > I'd also strongly suggest switching over to enabling
>network tests and
>> disabling bigevil.. Much lower overhead.
>>
>>Can you explain how I make that switch or refer me to any
>relevent docs?
>
>Really, all you need to do is make sure Net::DNS is
>installed.. SA 3.x will
>by default b
Good afternoon all,
I'm begining to see instances where my modified ifspamh script is
failing. Could be many reasons. Last night I had a spam attack of about
44k + messages (several thousand with 15 to 20 recipients each).
I currently have different scripts for each clients needs. I'd like to
r
Crhis,
Yes. Try using the rfci lists and/or AHBL (no they're not in the
code base as delivered, but they work very well).
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 10:53:26 2005
>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>Prece
Looks like 419'er are using instant messaging to get people now! Funny
conversation that a friend of mine had. Worth the read.
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/funny419.txt
(Friends name changed, but engrojie_adams is the real 419'er.
--Chris
I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM (no question
about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these accounts and feds
them in to sa-learn as SPAM.
I have no HAM's right now, however I have plans to add at leas
>I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
>
>I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM
>(no question
>about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these
>accounts and feds
>them in to sa-learn as SPAM.
>
>I have no HAM's right now, however I have plans to
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 21:54 schrieb Austin Weidner:
> I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
>
> I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM (no question
> about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these accounts and
> feds them in to sa-learn as
At 03:54 PM 2/15/2005, Austin Weidner wrote:
I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM (no question
about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these accounts and feds
them in to sa-learn as SPAM.
I have no HAM's right now, however I have plans to add at least a couple
h
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 22:08 schrieb Chris Santerre:
> >I have autolearned disabled in my SpamAssassin config.
> >
> >I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM
> >(no question
> >about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these
> >accounts and feds
> >them in to
Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 23:13 schrieb Daniel Cañas:
> On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Thomas Arend wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. Februar 2005 20:50 schrieb Daniel Cañas:
> >> I have over 2000 emails that I have as ham and would like to feed to
> >> sa-learn..
> >
[..]
> >> I have legit spam that I wa
At 04:26 PM 2/15/2005, Thomas Arend wrote:
The 1:1 ratio is a mistake based on a wrong interpretation of the bayes=20
theorem. I have a ham : spam ratio of 1 : 40.
No, it's not.. Dan Q actually corrected me once on this.. Technically, the
"optimal" ratio is 1:1, based on the testing done by the SA
>>The 1:1 ratio is a mistake based on a wrong interpretation of
>the bayes=20
>>theorem. I have a ham : spam ratio of 1 : 40.
>
>No, it's not.. Dan Q actually corrected me once on this..
>Technically, the
>"optimal" ratio is 1:1, based on the testing done by the SA
>development team.
>
>SA is v
Chris Santerre wrote:
The 1:1 ratio is a mistake based on a wrong interpretation of
the bayes=20
theorem. I have a ham : spam ratio of 1 : 40.
Also:
"I thing bayes is a very good addition to individual rules. And when it's
trained propper it works fine. "
I agree on a personal scale it works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
> At 03:54 PM 2/15/2005, Austin Weidner wrote:
> >I get certain e-mail accounts that are old and JUST GET SPAM (no question
> >about it). I set up a script that takes e-mails from these accounts and feds
> >them in to sa-learn as
Hi All,
Could anyone point me towards any useful info on how to cluster the SA
MySQL backend (Bayesian etc.)?
TIA
Nigel
At 04:56 PM 2/15/2005, Chris Santerre wrote:
Yes, it does tolerate a deviation well. But I remember DQ saying somethnig
like this.
Here's one reference to the post I was talking about. In the thread I'd
been suggesting "optimal" would be best if the training ratio matched your
"real world" spam:h
At 05:11 PM 2/15/2005, Justin Mason wrote:
Yes, this is one thing to watch out for. If the spamtrap accounts include
some accounts that *were* previously active as user accounts, you
*really* need to monitor those for the occasional ham slipping in.
I agree wholeheartedly.. This is also a concern
So do you think it is better for bayes if you try to keep this ratio more
toward 50/50? I find it is much harder to train HAM than it is SPAM. But if
a bad ratio is going to hurt things, one could shut down the SPAM trainer.
Basically, is too much SPAM a bad thing?
-Original Message-
Fr
At 06:00 PM 2/15/2005, Austin Weidner wrote:
So do you think it is better for bayes if you try to keep this ratio more
toward 50/50? I find it is much harder to train HAM than it is SPAM. But if
a bad ratio is going to hurt things, one could shut down the SPAM trainer.
Basically, is too much SPAM a
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:21:21 AM EST
From: Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re[2]: Care and feeding instructions for SpamAssassin?
> Next time you get one of those spam that sneaks through
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:28:41PM +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>
> Could anyone point me towards any useful info on how to cluster the SA
> MySQL backend (Bayesian etc.)?
>
Here is a nice little HOWTO:
http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-cluster-for-two-servers.html
Let me know
61 matches
Mail list logo
