On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:00:04PM +0100, Alexander Newald wrote:
> I have setup sa to use mysql db for bayes. I hope I understound that bayes
> db in mysql is seperated for each email (username) I use. Now I like to
> remove all data from the bayes mysql db that was created while using this
> s
I had a similar problem with T-Mobile and Cingular/AT&T...my office is
in a dead spot. Repeated complaints to T-Mobile didn't help. (Pity,
since they're by far the least expensive.) Reception is nonexistant
there for T-Mobile and hit-or-miss for AT&T. Step outside the building
a few feet a
Ya.. I feel the same way you do. The big issue is that verizon is a states
(USA) company. There is nothing wrong with that normally, except that
right now alot of people there think that its brilliant to outsource all
of the *meanial* programming, tech support, computer, IT, etc. work
overseas. Thi
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, David Brodbeck wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
> > I'm afraid that I'm going to have to argue that point.
> >
> > Cingular (formerly AT&T and Cingular) has the largest network, and neither
> > has been a population-centered or major highway-centered network in years.
>
> Lookin
At 04:35 PM 1/22/2005, Ron E. wrote:
I have spent some time searching for something I assumed existed,
which is a method of detecting when large quantities of the same message,
or messages with nearly the same content (body & subject) are passing
through an MTA within a specified time perio
At 03:08 PM 1/22/2005, Joe Polk wrote:
Cannot open bayes databases /home/jav/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
Inappropriate ioctl for device
Hmm, without more info it's tough to answer why you got that error... It
could be a non-existant directory issue, or a non-file matching the * (ie:
a
> the reason I suspected the net tests was because the problem happened
after
> we upgraded from version 2. we were keeping up before. I was thinking it
> was the net tests because I wasn't doing them in 2. I wasn't aware of
other
> changes from 2 to 3 that could be the cause. now if two used f
> months I had them. Verizon may be annoying, but at least I can use
> their system.
Note that Verizon and Verizon Wireless seem to be separate companies. I got
my cel phone from Verizon Wireless before Verizon itself was selling cell
phones. I still get separate bills, and pay them to differen
To be moderately fair to them the huge numbers of employees they used
to have are no longer needed to maintain even higher quality of service
than we saw in the days of the Strowger relays. The telephone systems
used to require HUGE buildings with rack upon rack upon rack, often
20' or higher of th
Well.. I do agree that equipment has gotten better, and they can maintain
alot of stuff with smaller equipement and less space, but I am talking
about an almost overnight shift in quality of service and layoff of entire
fleets of workers which dramatically degraded verizons ability to be
effective
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 04:35 PM 1/22/2005, Ron E. wrote:
> > I have spent some time searching for something I assumed existed,
> >which is a method of detecting when large quantities of the same message,
> >or messages with nearly the same content (body & subject)
At 02:49 AM 1/23/2005, Ron E. wrote:
Sounds interesting, but I thought DCC, like pyzor/razor simply checks
message content against known spam databases? How would one use it to
detect duplicate messages? Any idea?
Technicaly, DCC does not detect the "spamminess" of a message, it's just
how common
Most people that have seen a slowdown in 3.x seem to be due to thrashing
due
to larger memory usage.
how much RAM is recommended for a box that does nothing besides
Spamassassin?
Frank M. Cook
Association Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.acsplus.com
How can I force spamassassin to insert something like
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0
tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
even if a mail is not recognized as spam?
--
Jochen Kaechelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 10:06 AM 1/23/2005, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
How can I force spamassassin to insert something like
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0
tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
even if a mail is not recognized as spam?
Spamassassin should always insert an X-
Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2005, 10:34 -0500 schrieb Matt Kettler:
> At 10:06 AM 1/23/2005, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
> >How can I force spamassassin to insert something like
> >
> >X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0
> >tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
> >X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote:
>> months I had them. Verizon may be annoying, but at least I can use
>> their system.
>
>Note that Verizon and Verizon Wireless seem to be separate companies. I got
>my cel phone from Verizon Wireless before Verizon itself was selling cell
>phones.
> how much RAM is recommended for a box that does nothing besides
> Spamassassin?
It depends on your mail load. But in general, you can't have too much.
Loren
Greetings.
I'd like to propose a new rule to help SpamAssassin decide whether or not a
given message is spam. Namely, I think SA should test for the presence of
an X-Face header. The use of X-Face enjoys some popularity amongst users
of Unix and Usenet; on the other hand, in years of checking I
It wasn't non-existent files because I know they existed. As I said, I got the
same error with root. Apparently, when the update ran it screwed up something.
I found some posts via google that pointed to a new Bayes db needed. What I
did was, first turn off user_prefs. Something I kinda wanted to d
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
> I run debian/sid and
>
> spamassassin3.0.2-1
> amavisd-new 20030616p10-5
> postfix 2.1.5-5
[...]
> Nothing special ist done in the amavisd-new or postfix/main.cf
Look for $sa_tag_level_dflt in your amavisd.conf
jdow wrote:
With the advent of the charge for using 411 the usage went way down
allowing them to economise by dropping most of their 411 people. The
"O" process got inconvenient enough that they were able to drop the
number of "O" people.
I live in the Victor Valley area of California.
Verizon has
Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote:
months I had them. Verizon may be annoying, but at least I can use
their system.
Note that Verizon and Verizon Wireless seem to be separate companies. I got
They are indeed separate companies, and have been for at least a year
Mike Burger wrote:
You have to keep in mind, though, that T-Mobile (and its predecessors,
Voicestream, etc) and Sprint never had analog service (although Sprint's
phones would work on Verizon's analog network).
Sprint most likely forced roamers to use analog because then they could say
"our digi
At 11:17 AM 1/23/2005, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
> >even if a mail is not recognized as spam?
>
> Spamassassin should always insert an X-Spam-Status header by default.
>
> What version of SA are you using and how are you calling it?
>
I run debian/sid and
spamassassin3.0.2-1
amavisd-new 20030
At 11:34 AM 1/23/2005, Tristan Miller wrote:
I'd like to propose a new rule to help SpamAssassin decide whether or not a
given message is spam. Namely, I think SA should test for the presence of
an X-Face header. The use of X-Face enjoys some popularity amongst users
of Unix and Usenet; on the ot
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Steve Sobol wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > You have to keep in mind, though, that T-Mobile (and its predecessors,
> > Voicestream, etc) and Sprint never had analog service (although Sprint's
> > phones would work on Verizon's analog network).
>
> Sprint most likely forc
at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails that
were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
any help?
At 10:29 AM 1/23/2005, you wrote:
at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails that
were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
any help?
Depends on how you're calling SA. Sounds like you have two copies installed.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Sprint most likely forced roamers to use analog because then they could say
> > "our digital connection is better".
>
> Actually, Sprint just hasn't built out much in the way of rural networks
> for their wireless system. Probably never will.
I thin
At 01:29 PM 1/23/2005, Zé wrote:
at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails that
were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
Hmm, well, based on that little information nobody can really say much.
There really should be no FN problem
Em Domingo 23 Janeiro 2005 18:53, Matt Kettler escreveu:
> At 01:29 PM 1/23/2005, Zé wrote:
> >at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails that
> >were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
> >
> >I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
>
> Hmm, well, based on that little i
On Sunday 23 January 2005 09:29 am, Zé wrote:
> at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails that
> were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
>
> I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
>
> any help?
Be aware that the latest versions of SA install spamd in a different dire
Em Domingo 23 Janeiro 2005 21:24, John Andersen escreveu:
> On Sunday 23 January 2005 09:29 am, Zé wrote:
> > at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails
> > that were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
> >
> > I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
> >
> > any help?
>
Em Domingo 23 Janeiro 2005 21:24, John Andersen escreveu:
> On Sunday 23 January 2005 09:29 am, Zé wrote:
> > at this moment im using spamassassin 3.0.2 and im getting spam emails
> > that were filtered using spamassassin 3.0.0
> >
> > I runned spamassassin --lint and all is ok
> >
> > any help?
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
