On 2020-05-24 23:55, @lbutlr wrote:
On 22 May 2020, at 14:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
too many ip4 in there spf makes it untrusted here, sorry
Why would the number of OPv4 addresses matter?
is there a diffrence on one single ipv4 and more then 256 diffrence ips
?
lets say one make v=spf1 +
On 22 May 2020, at 14:25, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> too many ip4 in there spf makes it untrusted here, sorry
Why would the number of OPv4 addresses matter?
--
But of course there were the rules. Everyone knew there were rules.
They just had to hope like Hell that the gods knew the rules
On 2020-05-22 22:12, Alex wrote:
What am I missing?
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/?domain=infrascale.com
too many ip4 in there spf makes it untrusted here, sorry
infrascale.com can still make a better spf, if that solves anything
> X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain -
> client-ip=40.107.223.96;
> helo=nam11-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;
> envelope-from=u...@infrascale.com; receiver=recipi...@gmail.com
Oops, this wasn't actually a recipient at gmail.com, of course, but of
one of our users on thei
Hi,
We have an email from infrascale.com due to it being tagged with 9
points by KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC.
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain -
client-ip=40.107.223.96;
helo=nam11-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;
envelope-from=u...@infrascale.com; receiver=recipi...@gmail.com
