rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
>> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>> >>
>> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
> >>
> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
> >>
> >> Alex
> >
> > NO NO NO NO NO
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
>> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>
>> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
>>
>> Alex
>
> NO NO NO NO NO!
> Drop has the effect of tarpitting them :-)
Not quite, tarpitting is
Hi,
> not relevant to Spamassassin, is it?
>
> if you have to go way off topic at pleas be considerat and add an OT: tag to
> the subject.. > /dev/null
>
> or try: http://spam-l.com/mailman/listinfo
Yes, very much OT. I was following along with the other iptables comments.
Thanks for the point
On 11/25/2009 11:29 PM, Alex wrote:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP and enjoy the silence :-)
Trouble is that you have to be the one that drives to the colo to
eventually undo the rul
>> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>>
> Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DROP and enjoy the silence :-)
Trouble is that you have to be the one that drives to the colo to
eventually undo the rules :-)
Speaking of fw rules, h
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
>
> Alex
NO NO NO NO NO!
Drop has the effect of tarpitting them :-) As the Supremes sang;
"Set me free why don't you baby? You just k
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 19:20 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
> > Any more ranges most welcome :-)
>
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>
Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add:
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:49 PM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>
> umm side note, i spose to Tara...
>
> is Constant Contact like the default email marketing system (or one of
> them)
> for salesforce.com or whatever other large "online" customer management
> software??? or do you own them or they own you or
> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
Alex
>
> uri LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT m{constantcontact\.com\b}
> score LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT 12
> describe LOCAL_URI_C_CONTACT contains link to
> constant contact [dot] com
>
thanks Ned,
i do have a coupla companies that use CC for email so i wont totally whack.
they
thanks Tara, not the hugest biggie...
yet since we are only on a few select lists and use this email address, i
figured several others on this list were getting it too
i did forward both to abuse at your site with headers
happy gobble gobble everyone!
- rh
I've got Compliance on it alre
On ons 25 nov 2009 18:55:11 CET, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" wrote
Any more ranges most welcome :-)
iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
--
xpoint
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 17:34 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> >> R-Elists wrote:
> >>>
> >>> on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good
> >>> handle
> >>> on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Const
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
R-Elists wrote:
on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good
handle
on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Constant please share your SA
info
on that please?
Here's mine:
uri LOCAL
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> R-Elists wrote:
>>
>> just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on
>> our
>> "email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
>>
>> obviously trolling for email addresses
>>
>> would the Constant Contact
R-Elists wrote:
just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
"email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
obviously trolling for email addresses
would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate on this list please kick
some hiney after you ar
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:53 AM, R-Elists wrote:
>
>
> just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
> "email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
>
> obviously trolling for email addresses
>
> would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate o
On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:12 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> R-Elists wrote:
>> on a much more important note, can those on the list that have a good handle
>> on better filtering spam and/or UCE from Constant please share your SA info
>> on that please?
>>
> header CONSTANTCONTACT List-Unsubscribe
R-Elists wrote:
just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
"email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
obviously trolling for email addresses
would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate on this list please kick
some hiney after you are
just got spammed via constant contact via Aloha Communications Group on our
"email lists" email address from afrit...@aloha-com.ccsend.com
obviously trolling for email addresses
would the Constant Contact employee(s) and advocate on this list please kick
some hiney after you are done rolling ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
