From: Kai Schaetzl
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:40:00 +0100
Jeff Mincy wrote on Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:01:49 -0500:
> I use vbounce rules to detect bounce messages that were missed by
> various procmail filtering rules. Any message identified as a bounce
> is processed and deli
Jeff Mincy wrote on Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:01:49 -0500:
> I use vbounce rules to detect bounce messages that were missed by
> various procmail filtering rules. Any message identified as a bounce
> is processed and delivered differently in procmail rules. So, any
> vbounce FP is rather painful.
No,
From: Kai Schaetzl
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:31:17 +0100
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:42:16 +0100:
> FWIW, and to make Michael happy, I just caught one today -- hit another
> rule, __BOUNCE_OOO_3. Sadly, it also hit __BOUNCE_AUTO_REPLY. So there's
> mo
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:42:16 +0100:
> FWIW, and to make Michael happy, I just caught one today -- hit another
> rule, __BOUNCE_OOO_3. Sadly, it also hit __BOUNCE_AUTO_REPLY. So there's
> more to disable...
why? Why disable a rule because of a few FPs? If that rule isn't
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 13:12 -0500, sa-li...@techsuperpowers.com wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> > maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
> > messages?
> > (except in this mailing list :-)
> i noticed the same thing when we first st
On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
messages?
(except in this mailing list :-)
[ snip]
Report: Hi Brian, Thank you for getting this to us so quickly! We
will be sending a PO over within the next couple of
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:38 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > > just take out __BOUNCE_OOO_1. its too common in normal emails.
> >
> > Can't you just overwrite this one in local.cf? :)
>
> yes, if
it might be worth splitting out a new type of bounce rule --
"OOO_BOUNCE" which matches only OOO messages. if you make a patch I
may consider it ;)
--j.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 16:38, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheid
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
just take out __BOUNCE_OOO_1. its too common in normal emails.
Can't you just overwrite this one in local.cf? :)
yes, if I thought it was a 'local' problem only affecting me... that is
why I
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
> messages?
> (except in this mailing list :-)
> etc. I am going to enter a bugzilla to eliminate this rule
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6
maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
messages?
(except in this mailing list :-)
aside from missing an outbound relay or two, all my 'fps' on vbounce
seems to be out of office messages
some REAL ooo messages, some just a casual part of the email, something
like
11 matches
Mail list logo
