On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:06:32AM +1300, Kathryn Allan wrote:
> I would have though that the rule file would have ended up inside the
> updates_spamassassin_org folder as all the other .cf files seem to be
> inside there.
updates_spamassassin_org is for update files from updates.spamassassin.or
Hi all,
I have recently inherited the responsibility of looking after our spam
machine as such i'm having a few teething issues : )
I just followed the instructions in the sare-sa-update-howto.txt I am
just a bit confused as to whether I have done it correctly originally in
the /var/lib/spam
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:22 AM
To: James E. Pratt
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re[2]: problem with using SARE rules, names longer than 22
chars
Hello James,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 6:09:51 AM
Hello James,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 6:09:51 AM, you wrote:
JEP> I had the same probllem with sa 3.04
JEP> Anyhow, i solved it by changing the trusted ruleset entry
JEP> "SARE_HEADER_0" to "SARE_HEADER_X31" as advised on rulesemporium.com,
JEP> and all works fine now.
Either you misread th
From: "James E. Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo wrote:
Hi,
We're using spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 with amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf.
Since yesterday I'm receiving this message when downloading the SARE
rules:
***WARNING***: spamassassin --li
From: "Jo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo wrote:
Hi,
We're using spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 with amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf.
Since yesterday I'm receiving this message when downloading the SARE
rules:
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, n
James E. Pratt schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Jo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:05 AM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: problem with using SARE rules, names longer than 22 chars
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo wrote
Jo wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Jo wrote:
>>>
>>> Are these simply problems with the names?
>> Yes, but it's not really a problem.
>>
> Thanks for your answer. I only saw after I sent the mail that they were
> only warnings and not errors. I'm a bit less worried now. I thought I
> had a
-Original Message-
From: Jo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:05 AM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: problem with using SARE rules, names longer than 22 chars
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Jo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>&
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo wrote:
Hi,
We're using spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 with amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf.
Since yesterday I'm receiving this message when downloading the SARE
rules:
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollb
Jo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're using spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 with amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf.
> Since yesterday I'm receiving this message when downloading the SARE
> rules:
>
> ***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
> Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
> Rollback comman
Hi,
We're using spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 with amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf.
Since yesterday I'm receiving this message when downloading the SARE rules:
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv -f
/etc/mail
gt; From: JP Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 December 2005 05:31
> To: SpamAssassin
> Cc: Robert Menschel
> Subject: SA not using SARE rules?
>
> It seems SA is not using the SARE rulesets for me?
> I see no mention of SARE in any of my tagged spam.
> I hav
It seems SA is not using the SARE rulesets for me?
I see no mention of SARE in any of my tagged spam.
I have been using rules_du_jour and downloading current rulesets.
Any ideas why SA would not be using SARE rulesets?
14 matches
Mail list logo