> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
>
> Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
> have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
> message I received.
Hi, ezmlm,
Yes, we have tr
Thanks for helping.
Bruce
ser...@megavoice.com
Quoting users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
ser...@megavoice.com
removed from the users mailing list, please s
Zitat von users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
lucab...@lucabert.de
removed from the users mailing list, please send a short reply
to this address:
use
...@spamassassin.apache.org wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.
If this message bounces too, I will
babedh-d...@biggdog.biz skrev den 2014-04-25 02:49:
I do not want to unsubscribe.
so do nothing
whats your real name ?
I do not want to unsubscribe.
Quoting Sean Kennedy :
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:50 +, users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org
wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
skenn...@office.vcn.com
re
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:50 +, users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org
wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
> To confirm that you would like
>
>skenn...@office.vcn.com
>
> removed from the user
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-10-24 10:02:
he did send the message. But he forwarded the confirmation message to
the
list, instead of where he had to...
is this a GroupWise feature to reply to innocent people ?
On 24.10.13 08:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Webmaster DKDB skrev den 2013-10-24 07:56:
X-Mailer: GroupWise 2012
mangler dkdb.dk spænding i livet ?
hvis du ønsker at framelde denne mailliste så skal du ikke skrive til
den, men skrive til manageren som kan findes på
To remove your address from t
Webmaster DKDB skrev den 2013-10-24 07:56:
X-Mailer: GroupWise 2012
mangler dkdb.dk spænding i livet ?
hvis du ønsker at framelde denne mailliste så skal du ikke skrive til
den, men skrive til manageren som kan findes på
To remove your address from the list, send a message to:
[removed
>>> 24-10-2013 kl. 07:39 skrev i
>>> meddelelsen
UID6893-1321632709:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
> To confirm that you would like
>
>webmas...@dkdb.dk
>
> removed f
John Games | jga...@sitp.net
SITP Inc
Cell: 806.281.2386
Office: 806.771.2300>>> On 5/19/2010 at 12:48 PM, wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing theusers@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.To confirm that you would like jga...@sitp.netremoved from the users mailing
: [-1004.0] warning from users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce
message I received.
If
Hallo Karsten,
Am 2008-10-08 16:23:15, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient
> caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic
> Language Character Set". Yeah, right...
You have gotten tonns of "MAILER-DAEMON" messa
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for
days. I prefer it like that.
+1
guenther
Suffering from a backscatter wave,
same here, started yesterday.
and haven't even got sufficient
caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an u
Can this off-topic thread please die already? It has been quite for
days. I prefer it like that.
guenther
Suffering from a backscatter wave, and haven't even got sufficient
caffeine. "Your email was quarantined due to an unauthorized Cyrillic
Language Character Set". Yeah, right...
--
char
On Wed, October 8, 2008 02:25, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad:
> Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens?
here i have 1600x1200 in a frammebuffer, why do i need to install x11 ?
> Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement, consumin
Am 2008-10-07 11:35:31, schrieb Don Saklad:
> Someday, in the future when we have real computers users would have
> things the way they prefer.
Do you relay think, Servers would change?
Why wast resources for funny 2500x1900 screens?
Servers doing non-releated stuff are bad for our Environement,
Someday, in the future when we have real computers users would have
things the way they prefer.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> Am 2008-10-01 08:05:11, schrieb Don Saklad:
>> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
>> doesn't have a bracketed li
Am 2008-10-01 08:05:11, schrieb Don Saklad:
> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
>
> Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!
I am currently on 117 Mailinglists and only ,
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:05 -0400, Don Saklad wrote:
> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
Please, not again. This topic has been discussed to death before. Try
using a search-engine. Starting this y
Matt Kettler wrote:
Don Saklad wrote:
Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!
This shouldn't be a programing solution. It's the RFC stand
Don Saklad wrote:
> What do the jargon terms mean?... in
MTA = Mail Transfer Agent (aka mail server)
MUA = Mail User Agent (aka Outlook, Thunderbird, etc)
--
Bowie
What do the jargon terms mean?... in
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:05:11 Don Saklad wrote:
>> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
>> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in t
Don Saklad wrote:
> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
>
> Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!
>
>
This shouldn't be a programing solution. It's the RFC standardized way
to
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:05:11 Don Saklad wrote:
> Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
> doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
>
> Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!
Discussing this further might just lead t
Of the many many subscriptions this is the only subscription that
doesn't have a bracketed list name inserted in the header subject.
Programming solutions don't work for users not programmers!
so that for my subscription to
> users@spamassassin.apache.org
> the header line of messages would appear for example something like
> Subject: [usersspamassassin] identifying headers
> with the bracketed name of the list inserted
> into every list message subject line.
This is way OT for
Thank you!
I'm looking for a workaround, a kludge so that for my subscription to
users@spamassassin.apache.org
the header line of messages would appear for example something like
Subject: [usersspamassassin] identifying headers
with the bracketed name of the list inserted
into every list me
Don Saklad wrote:
It would be better to have the header something like
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. It is more efficient to use better mail software. This has already
been discussed here and on other lists (search the archives).
See also:
http://www.w3.org/Mail/subject-tagging
http://too
It would be better to have the header something like
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Saklad wrote:
How do you setup things so that
all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org
include identifying headers that begin something like
Subject: [usersspamassassin]
don't play with the subject. the subject is set by the sender for the
recipient to see what the messa
Don Saklad schrieb:
> How do you setup things so that
> all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org
> include identifying headers that begin something like
> Subject: [usersspamassassin]
I use the List-Id: header in order to sort messages into a separate folder:
List-Id:
-- Matthias
How do you setup things so that
all messages from users@spamassassin.apache.org
include identifying headers that begin something like
Subject: [usersspamassassin]
.
t let me
> know.
>
>
>
> I am trying to send an email to users@spamassassin.apache.org to ask a
> question. I have done this in the past with out running into any problems.
> However, when I now try sending to users@spamassassin.apache.org, the email
>
David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 18:44, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:08:50AM -0400, Michael Di Martino wrote:
> > > So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
> >
> > Razor compares MIME part hashes and URI domain hashes to a central
> > database where people
So one does not need to actually use Razor explicitely?
One does not need to use razor at all. It is a network test, and you can
run with network test disabled. You can also run with network tests
enabled, but specifically disable Razor. And I'm sure there are many admins
that do this for
On Sunday 13 August 2006 18:44, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:08:50AM -0400, Michael Di Martino wrote:
> > So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
>
> Razor compares MIME part hashes and URI domain hashes to a central
> database where people have reported that "this is spa
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Michael Di Martino wrote:
> > Which is best and what do these actauly offer over spamassassin's own
> > rulesets?
>
> So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
The basic difference is that SA rules try to analyze the message to
determine "does this message look like spam?
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:08:50AM -0400, Michael Di Martino wrote:
> So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
Razor compares MIME part hashes and URI domain hashes to a central
database where people have reported that "this is spam".
SA's ruleset looks for spammy components of messages, inclu
Michael Di Martino writes:
> > Which is best and what do these actauly offer over spamassassin's own
> > rulesets?
> >
>
> So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
it's entirely different -- it's a hash-sharing system, with parts
similar to SURBL. Hard to tell, really, though, as it's prop
> Which is best and what do these actauly offer over spamassassin's own
> rulesets?
>
So how does razor differ over SA's ruleset?
Regards,
Michael Di Martino
Director of MIS
The telx Group
Office: 212 480 3300 X.2022
Cell: 646 207 6603
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent from my B
On 12/04/2005 07:22 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> users@spamassassin.apache.org mailing list.
>
> To confirm that you would like
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> added to the users mailing list, please send
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:38:10PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
> But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
> server..please help
> How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
>
Question, are you using a 3rd party
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:38, liyas_m m typed:
> Hi,
> I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
> But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
> server..please help
> How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
You may have misconceptions about how SpamAssass
Hi
How have you configured SA? What is calling it: procmail, amavis,
MailScanner...???
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
liyas_m m wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
But it doest seem to stop the spam email t
Hi,
I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
server..please help
How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
Thanks you
Alias
Just to keep up with listing the spam gangs; coolestrxever. com
belongs to the taiwantelco/taiwanmedial group. (and is one of their fake
Beverly Hills 90210/90211 addresses). BTW. The latest registrations have
moved back to Turkey (where they started), but use a Pakistani cellular
phone a
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl <[EM
Sorry if you see a double post ... it was my bad to forget to
remove the ** spam ** flags in the subject.
Original Message
Subject: Re: *SPAM* SpamAssassin 3.0.2 flags messages from
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:58:00 -0400
From: Martin G. Diehl
Thomas Cameron wrote:
so I whitelist on: List-Id:
Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
All that I was able to find out is that it locally coding and is part
of the user login.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Martin G. Diehl
n our messages.
OTOH, try to visualize the congress critters trying (and failing) to
discuss 'int3rn3t p0rn' without using any 'bad words' (TM). LOL
I know that someone is going to say, "whitelist" ...
The settings for my profile include
Allowed Email Addresses
us
On Sun 8 May 05 18:46, "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > so I whitelist on:
> > List-Id:
>
> Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
Well, I think Loren answered it, but I tend to use other filtering tools
to deal with that, so in procmail, I'd do somethi
> > so I whitelist on:
> > List-Id:
>
> Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
Don't know about the OP's, but mine is
header WHITELIST_SA List-Id =~
/(?:dev|users)\.spamassassin\.apache\.org/i
describe WHITELIST_SA SA List
score WHITELIST_SA -100
You can simpl
so I whitelist on:
List-Id:
Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
Thanks!
Thomas
hitelist on:
List-Id: It simply works, though I
don't really think about it being a non-standard way to whitelist. I've
been doing that for many years.
> (b) or if the original addressing was leading to the whitelist false
> negative
To be honest, I don't know. I don't h
for my profile include
Allowed Email Addresses
users@spamassassin.apache.org
dev@spamassassin.apache.org
For the most part, that works ... with only ~ 1% getting flagged as SPAM.
I don't know exactly which package is doing the whitelist filtering, nor
how that is integrated w
Alexander Piavka wrote:
Hi, any ideas why this happens in SA-3.0.2
Thanks
And when are you going to get a message from
users@spamassassin.apache.org that would match this rule? How did you
try to test it?
Keep in mind that posts on the list are addressed TO
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hi, any ideas why this happens in SA-3.0.2
Thanks
I've been running with a new configuration for the past week and I wanted
to garner any comments you may have.
For the past week, I have been running Exim w/ Exiscan. I used to deny at
the SMTP level failures on dnslist blacklists and other fatal issues. Now
I permit all connections to proceed (
Anyone else seeing this junk when sending messages to the list?
gbierman at mochamail.com, apparently the address at this site
subscribed to the SA users list - please tell the postmaster of your
system to fix this.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:03:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> us
62 matches
Mail list logo
