> From: Dave Koontz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not neccessarily. Put your awl on a sql database and add a timestamp
> column
> to the awl table, which gets automagically a new timestamp by the dbms
> each
> time a record is updated. The "timestamp" column type in Mysql is such
a
> type.
>
> show
Andy Figueroa wrote:
> What is the evolving conventional wisdom regarding using AWL?
I have no idea, but I do know what *my* "wisdom" regarding the AWL is.
We don't use the AWL because it gave us problems. I have no idea wether others
have had the same problems.
1: Some ham was given very high
-Original Message-
From: Alex Woick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: Andy Figueroa; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: use or not use awl
Matt Kettler wrote:
> That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: Andy Figueroa; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: use or not use awl
Matt Kettler wrote:
> That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for
> production use on servers with reasonabl
Alex Woick wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for production
>> use on servers with reasonable mail volume. I say that because it
>> completely lacks any kind of useful (ie: atime based) expiry mechanism.
>> The only way to prune the AWL databa
Matt Kettler wrote:
That said, I think the AWL is a great idea, but not ready for production
use on servers with reasonable mail volume. I say that because it
completely lacks any kind of useful (ie: atime based) expiry mechanism.
The only way to prune the AWL database is by hitcount, using the
c
Andy Figueroa wrote:
> I'm growing increasingly wary of running with AWL enabled (I am).
> When I see AWL invoked on particular messages, the score seems to push
> as often in the wrong direction as in the nominal right direction.
>
> What is the evolving conventional wisdom regarding using AWL?
I'm growing increasingly wary of running with AWL enabled (I am). When
I see AWL invoked on particular messages, the score seems to push as
often in the wrong direction as in the nominal right direction.
What is the evolving conventional wisdom regarding using AWL?
Andy Figueroa
