> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Brennan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:49 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: uribl.com implementing ACLs
>
>
>
> > No donations
>
> IT departments managed by fo
No donations
IT departments managed by folks with corporate backgrounds don't even
have a procedure for sending off checks in arbitrary amounts solely
because somebody thinks it would be a nice thing to do.
Just say that large sites have to pay for rsync and put a price on it.
That turns it i
of
URIBL. They are the delusional rantings of someone playing too much xbox 360
at night.)
-Original Message-
From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:36 AM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: uribl.com implementing ACLs
Oli Schacher w
g too much xbox 360
at night.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:36 AM
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: uribl.com implementing ACLs
>
>
> Oli Schacher wrote:
> >
Oli Schacher wrote:
I've just heard that uribl.com is implementing ACLs for heavy hitters.
For those running ISP/ASPs doing millions of queries you may want to
watch your logs.
They not blocking queries (yet?) but return a "REFUSED"
I believe we are already blocking some major heavy hitters
I've just heard that uribl.com is implementing ACLs for heavy hitters.
For those running ISP/ASPs doing millions of queries you may want to
watch your logs.
They not blocking queries (yet?) but return a "REFUSED"
Regards,
Oli
