It's harmless and fixed in next libwww:
https://github.com/libwww-perl/libwww-perl/issues/410
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 02:04:38PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I'm getting the following error when my update_rules script runs:
>
> "my" variable $uri masks earlier declaration in same scope at
> /
I'm getting the following error when my update_rules script runs:
"my" variable $uri masks earlier declaration in same scope at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/LWP/UserAgent.pm line 783.
I think(?) this comes from this package:
❯ pkg info p5-libwww
p5-libwww-6.63
Name : p5-libwww
Ver
hi list,
it all comes down to this single rule:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeaderEval
header __RCVD_IN_2WEEKSeval:received_within_months('0', '0.46')
describe __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS Received: within the past 2 weeks
endif
which was removed in '72_active.cf' in the most current
Hi list,
I've written a small plugin which will output some timing details
in order to check whether a mail comes in with severe delay...
... not 100% complete at this stage - but it gives some timing
clues in the log.
However...
... for some weird reason will this plugin only work by using
the
> "MM" == Mark Martinec writes:
MM> Did the rule __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS end up in the current sa-update set?
MM> If so, you can either remove the rule, or install the SA from ... SVN.
If I http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DownloadFromSvn often, does that
mean I don't need to use sa-update anymore
On Sunday September 6 2009 11:03:23 jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Help, sa-update gives:
>
> rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS test, skipping:
> (Can't locate object method "received_within_months" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 755) line 19. )
> channel: lint ch
Help, sa-update gives:
rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "received_within_months" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 755) line 19.
)
channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Andrea Fino wrote:
> what system is the preferred one to keep update 3.0 spamassassin
> installations?
Upgrade to 3.1, then run sa-update. ;)
No, seriously.
3.0 has no real way to update the rules, other than upgrading the code, but
there are generally
Hi to all,
what system is the preferred one to keep update 3.0 spamassassin
installations?
Regards,
Andrea Fino
--
Andrea Fino 8-) - "Sistemi su misura di qualita' industriale"
"Handcrafted systems with industrial quality"
[Web: http://www.faino.org ]+[Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
--On Saturday, November 11, 2006 3:20 PM -0500 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"spamassassin --lint -D" will show what rule files are being used.
Weekly is probably a good choice, daily is as frequent as I would suggest
at the moment.
It uses DNS to detect new updates, doesn't it?
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:08:08PM -0500, Debbie D wrote:
> OK thanks Theo.. what would be the best way for the to triple verify indeed
> it is picking up these new rules?? I'll set this to cron today on a weekly
> basic I think.. is that frequent enough??
"spamassassin --lint -D" will show wha
"Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:31:31PM -0500, Debbie D wrote:
>> Is sa-update something built in or is it an plug-in??
>
>It's a script that comes with 3.1.
>
>> I ran sa-update && service spamassassin restart
>> and was
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:31:31PM -0500, Debbie D wrote:
> Is sa-update something built in or is it an plug-in??
It's a script that comes with 3.1.
> I ran sa-update && service spamassassin restart
> and was told spamassassin is an unknown service (dur I knew that)
Ok. replace "service spamass
>>>Rule #1 - Let someone else ask the really stupid question for you first!
Have I been sleeping?? (yea probably have been)
Is sa-update something built in or is it an plug-in??
OK Before you guys get out the whips and chains yes I did some googling:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdate
Am 11.11.2006 um 01:18 schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea:
Justin Mason wrote:
Randal, Phil writes:
I've just run sa-update -D and it's failed with return code 4.
update 473327:
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID
Justin Mason wrote:
Randal, Phil writes:
I've just run sa-update -D and it's failed with return code 4.
update 473327:
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK_LESS
As a result, the rules get rolled back.
Randal, Phil writes:
> I've just run sa-update -D and it's failed with return code 4.
>
> update 473327:
>
> config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK
> config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK_LESS
>
> As a result, the rules get rolled back.
oops.
I've just run sa-update -D and it's failed with return code 4.
update 473327:
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK
config: warning: score set for non-existent rule PART_CID_STOCK_LESS
As a result, the rules get rolled back.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engine
> I just install a new version of spamassassin.
> What do I need to do, so it learns everything?
You may wish to run sa-update:
Or install additional add-on rules:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Or run sa-learn against a recent set of ham (non-spam) and spam
messages. The bay
I just install a new version of spamassassin.
What do I need to do, so it learns everything?
20 matches
Mail list logo
