On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> > The most important issues here are to get a usable SA,
> > and to get a useful bug report. In that order.
> Oh, I forgot that re2c. It is re2c 0.12.1 from some Debian repo. I use
> also backports..
OK, re2c 0.12.1 should work jus
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 23:24 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >> Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> >>
> >>> Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
> > When asking about touching Perl, I wasn't actually
> > thinking of Perl itself, but Perl modules relevant to
> > this i
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 17:35 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>
> > Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
>
> Maybe. there is/was a bug in perl 5.10.* I think that was fixed.
Obviously, Jari is using Perl 5.8.x and SA 3.2.5, as can be seen in
Am 25.10.2008 17:22 Uhr, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Any chance you touched your system and Perl?
Maybe. there is/was a bug in perl 5.10.* I think that was fixed.
> Yes, this might have an
> impact on SpamAssassin. Kind of reminds me of the broken re2c 0.11.x
> issue discussed when SA 3.2.0 h
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 02:52 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Somehow, suddenly my SpamAssassin is broken.
>
> /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
> /var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/5.008/3.002005/auto/Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0/body_0.so:
> u
Somehow, suddenly my SpamAssassin is broken.
/usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/5.008/3.002005/auto/Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0/body_0.so:
undefined symbol: Mail_SpamAssassin_CompiledRegexps_body_0_scan1
No joy with sa-update, sa-compile, spamd
