On Tue, May 13, 2008 23:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch.
> you just told all spammers to use "mx +all" in SPF records for their domains
> to be able to use them for world-wide spamming
basic score in spf is olso very low pr default, o
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all"
> > in SPF
On 13.05.08 21:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
no, forwarders need to.
> come on, srs and +all it
On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all"
> in SPF
yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient
diff is that i dont use srs installed an
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others forwardi
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
>
> > a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others forwarding your
e-mail (without rewriting mail from: w
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
> a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
stop annoying me that spf cant be used
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I know is that I don't use SPF anymore for my domain as there are
just too many problems... e.g., forwarded messages.
and you usely dont know where you forwards going from, :/(
unless you receive spam
On Sun, May 11, 2008 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All I know is that I don't use SPF anymore for my domain as there are
> just too many problems... e.g., forwarded messages.
and you usely dont know where you forwards going from, :/(
come on, please :-)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
>> All a spam program would have to do is say "[EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
>> to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
>> one more post from him, muhahaha."
SB> If "Bob" posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said
SB> list(s), then the other subs of that list
All a spam program would have to do is say "[EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
one more post from him, muhahaha."
If "Bob" posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said list(s),
then the other subs of that list will immediat
On Thu, May 8, 2008 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I suppose that would be caught by SPF rules etc., if bob likes SPF.
what are you talking about ?, to score email addresses found on maillist a bit
negative since it looks like none spammy human ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http
Odd how mailing lists that don't obfuscate addresses don't see more
trusted mailing list subscriber spam.
All a spam program would have to do is say "[EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
one more post from him, muhah
12 matches
Mail list logo
