hat means my message types
don't change much. ;-)
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "sinnerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: help with training bayesian filter
I'm running spamd as:
spamd -
sinnerman wrote:
> I'm running spamd as:
>
> spamd -d -l -u nobody --siteconfigpath=
>
Is there a particular reason why you're using the --siteconfigpath?
The reason I ask is nearly everyone I've seen use this option, mis-uses
it. The only time you should want to use this option is if you need
sinnerman wrote:
> I think I've solved the issues:
>
> * I've stoped using spamc/spamd, and now just use spamassassin (running as
> my logged in user, just like sa-learn). I think that has solved the issue of
> which bayesian database is being used.
>
Well, your spamd startup was forcing everyth
ugh it was a
standard plugin):
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold
Also, I've found some other help topics on this, and now understand that
autolearn doesn't rely just on the computed score.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-wi
arn set? That's what turns it on/off.
>
> --
> Gus
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-training-bayesian-filter-tf4643977.html#a13267625
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:27:52PM -0700, sinnerman wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I currently have SpamAssaassin setup on my FreeBSD machine and have trained
> it with spam and ham messages (greater than the min thresholds of 200/200).
> However, I'm not sure it's setup correctly, nor do I see any obvio
der still says "autolearn=no". Do I need to
enable autolearning in some other way?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/help-with-training-bayesian-filter-tf4643977.html#a13265066
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
> I'm using amavisd with SA. There is a directive there called
> "sa_mail_body_size_limit = undef; # don't waste time on SA if mail is
> larger". This was set to 1024*200 which would be 204800k. I've
> actually just now set it to undef. Hopefully this is what you meant? I
> don't
I'm using amavisd with SA. There is a directive there called
"sa_mail_body_size_limit = undef; # don't waste time on SA if mail is
larger". This was set to 1024*200 which would be 204800k. I've
actually just now set it to undef. Hopefully this is what you meant? I
don't have high hopes. But, we'l
> What I meant is that Amavisd may look in a non-standard place for
> SpamAssassin's local.cf and other config files. I looked at my Amavis
> config file and did not see a place to change it, but I seem to remember
> somebody saying that it is possible.
The only thing that needs to be remembered
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Amavis uses SA's config file for rules, scores, and plugins. Just
> > keep in mind that it may be looking in a non-standard place for the
> > config depending on your setup.
> >
> > Amavis adds some extra scoring on top of the SA score and does it's
> > own mar
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Darn. I thought that might be
the problem. Well, back to square one.
>> You are right, this
is not the right list for amavisd questions, but
>> where do
you draw the line?
>
> If the question is about rules,
scoring or plugins, ask it here. If the
> question is abo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Darn. I thought that might be the problem. Well, back to square one.
> You are right, this is not the right list for amavisd questions, but
> where do you draw the line?
If the question is about rules, scoring or plugins, ask it here. If the
question is about markup a
Darn. I thought that might be the problem. Well, back to square one. You
are right, this is not the right list for amavisd questions, but where do
you draw the line?
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:49:35PM
-0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So, the bayes_path is set in
my local.cf files and it poin
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:49:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, the bayes_path is set in my local.cf files and it points to
> "/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes". Now, in my
> "/etc/mail/spamassassin" I have two files, bayes_seen and
> bayes_toks. So, really the line should read:
> "/etc/mail/s
So, the bayes_path is set in my local.cf files and it points to
"/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes". Now, in my
"/etc/mail/spamassassin" I have two files, bayes_seen and
bayes_toks. So, really the line should read:
"/etc/mail/spamassassin" right?
Amavisd runs at
amavisd user. So, which options does t
Let's keep traffic on the list, please. Other people might be able to
help you and/or benefit from this discussion.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the bayes_path defined at?
bayes_path would be defined in local.cf. Try man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf for more info.
Running sa-learn as ro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I train
the spamassassin using sa-learn for ham and spam respectively, it seems to
only work for the ham not the spam. The command runs fine, but spam e-mail
that I trained spamassassin with still show up
Do you have a size limit set? I.E. only messages less than xxx size
will be scanned-and are these spam greater than xxx.
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2007 4:14 AM >>>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I
> train the spamassassin using sa
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm
invoking it through amavisd. When I
> train the spamassassin
using sa-learn for ham and spam respectively,
> it seems to only
work for the ham not the spam. The command runs fine,
> but spam
e-mail that I trained spamassassin with st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I train
the spamassassin using sa-learn for ham and spam respectively, it seems to
only work for the ham not the spam. The command runs fine, but spam e-mail
that I trained spamassassin with still show up
Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I
train
the spamassassin using sa-learn for ham and spam respectively,
it seems to
only work for the ham not the spam. The command runs
fine, but spam e-mail
that I trained spamassassin with still show up
untagged as spam. The
Larry wrote:
I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
the bayesin filter. I have a question.
Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when I
train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
I wouldn't think you should train the
Larry wrote:
> I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
> the bayesin filter. I have a question.
>
> Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when
> I train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
> I wouldn't think you should tra
I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
the bayesin filter. I have a question.
Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when I
train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
I wouldn't think you should train the filter with the
Hello,
I recently setup bayesian filtering with my mail system, Postfix +
Spamassassin.
I tried to train bayesian filter by forwarding spam to a particular
address e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], by following this reference in the web
http://jousset.org/pub/sa-postfix.en.html, and
even changed my MUA to
26 matches
Mail list logo
