RE: threads

2004-11-07 Thread Noel K Hall II
Can't we all just get along? =) -Original Message- From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 5:38 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: threads Are you a police officer? If so under what authority? {^_^} (Let's see if I can get hi

Re: threads

2004-11-07 Thread JP
> Are you a police officer? If so under what authority? > {^_^} (Let's see if I can get him to bi*ch about top posting too.) Are you a Troll? Looks that way. And there is no need for police officers if the community polices itself! I am very thankful to the folks (though sometimes they could

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread jdow
Are you a police officer? If so under what authority? {^_^} (Let's see if I can get him to bi*ch about top posting too.) - Original Message - From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jdow wrote on Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:12:48 -0800: > > > And braying about it with loud complaints is poi

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Lisa Casey wrote on Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:19:57 -0500: > This shouldn't break threading AFAIK. It does. Just because you don't see it that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Matt just explained it in detail. So, please just accept it: new messages are to be posted with the "New Message" button or wha

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jdow wrote on Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:12:48 -0800: > And braying about it with loud complaints is pointless. It WILL > happen. Roll with the punches. If a broken email thread is the worst > thing that happens to you before you die even God would be astonished. > I don't see your point. If you don't

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread Pat Lashley
BTW, Mulberry (what I use) lets me "reply" to a message then select "Create new message", which effectively deletes the References header (and body and subject) from the new message while maintaining the addressing information. Highly recommended. And if you did choose 'reply' but then change the s

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, November 05, 2004 5:19 PM -0500 Lisa Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 It helps to see the actual headers, and unfortunately OE

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread jdow
From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > See how your message is threaded in with the others? Look for other > threads where the subject line changes in mid thread. Most of those > are from people "thread-stealing". Thread-stealing is considered rude > by

Re: threads

2004-11-06 Thread Bob Proulx
above subjects. http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general See how your message is threaded in with the others? Look for other threads where the subject line changes in mid thread. Most of those are from people "thread-stealing". Thread-stealing is considered rude

Re: threads

2004-11-05 Thread Kelson
Lisa Casey wrote: Anytime I have started a new thread on this list, I have started out by replying to some other message (just to get the users@spamassassin.apache.org e-mail address in the To: field (deleting any others that might be in there), then I completely delete the subject, retype a new

threads

2004-11-05 Thread Lisa Casey
Hi, - Original Message - From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:31 PM Subject: Re: spamassassin lint > and asking you the same: please stop mailing new questions by > replying to some other mail. Every email program has s