Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2013-01-07 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 12/8/2012 8:30 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote: FYI, see $SUBJ. Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is reasonable to use. I plan to fix these both with the 3.4.0 release assuming we can update our website when that's done. Bu

Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-17 Thread darxus
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote: > FYI, see $SUBJ. Just noticed I opened a bug about this nearly a year and a half ago: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 -- "Anarchy is based on the observation that since few are fit to rule themselves, even fewer are fit to rule others." -E

Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-09 Thread Per Jessen
Bob Proulx wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: >> dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: >> > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately >> > implies is reasonable to use. >> > >> > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running >> > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even

Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-09 Thread Bob Proulx
Per Jessen wrote: > dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately > > implies is reasonable to use. > > > > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running > > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.

Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-08 Thread Per Jessen
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote: >> FYI, see $SUBJ. > > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately > implies is reasonable to use. > > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even onc

Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-08 Thread darxus
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote: > FYI, see $SUBJ. Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is reasonable to use. I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists. -- "We will be dead

the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient

2012-12-08 Thread Per Jessen
FYI, see $SUBJ. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (-0.7°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland.