Re: test my auto-generated ruleset

2008-02-11 Thread Justin Mason
Larry Nedry writes: > I've been using Justin Mason's auto-generated rule set since mid October > and am fairly happy with it. Up until Jan 11, false positives averaged > about 10% of the hits and I can live with that. > > I noticed a surprising change on Jan 11, 2008. Before that day many of th

Re: test my auto-generated ruleset

2008-02-11 Thread Larry Nedry
I've been using Justin Mason's auto-generated rule set since mid October and am fairly happy with it. Up until Jan 11, false positives averaged about 10% of the hits and I can live with that. I noticed a surprising change on Jan 11, 2008. Before that day many of the hits were on low scoring (< 2

Re: test my auto-generated ruleset

2007-10-17 Thread Justin Mason
Larry Nedry writes: > On 8/13/07 at 4:01 PM +0100 Justin Mason wrote: > >I've been working on a new way to auto-generate body rules recently... > > Are these rules restricted to Spamassassin 3.2 or newer? > > The following is what I get when I dig 8.1.3.sought.rules.yerp.org. Notice > the NXDOM

Re: test my auto-generated ruleset

2007-10-16 Thread Larry Nedry
On 8/13/07 at 4:01 PM +0100 Justin Mason wrote: >I've been working on a new way to auto-generate body rules recently... Are these rules restricted to Spamassassin 3.2 or newer? The following is what I get when I dig 8.1.3.sought.rules.yerp.org. Notice the NXDOMAIN. Thanks for the great work! N

test my auto-generated ruleset

2007-08-13 Thread Justin Mason
I've been working on a new way to auto-generate body rules recently -- I discussed it on my blog at http://taint.org/2007/03/05/134447a.html and http://taint.org/2007/08/04/200125a.html . Anyway, the results are checked into SVN trunk daily in the "rulesrc/sandbox/jm/20_sought.cf" file. We haven'