On Sat, 16 May 2020 09:26:23 -0400
micah anderson wrote:
> RW writes:
> >> Would it be better to use it for mass-check and contribute some to
> >> the overall rule scoring?
> >
> > If you use it for Bayes or mass-checks I'd suggest not relaxing any
> > pre-SpamAssassin checks. Some people do t
RW writes:
>> I'm wanting to setup a spam trap, that should receive nothing but
>> actual spam, and feed that into spamassassin in some way. I'm
>> wondering the best way to automate feeding that data back to the
>> system.
>>
>> Would it be best used for bayes tuning? It seems not, because it w
On Fri, 15 May 2020 17:58:17 -0400
micah anderson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wanting to setup a spam trap, that should receive nothing but
> actual spam, and feed that into spamassassin in some way. I'm
> wondering the best way to automate feeding that data back to the
> system.
>
> Would it be be
Hi all,
I'm wanting to setup a spam trap, that should receive nothing but actual
spam, and feed that into spamassassin in some way. I'm wondering the
best way to automate feeding that data back to the system.
Would it be best used for bayes tuning? It seems not, because it would
be 100% spam. W
