super duper, no need for me to drop spampd for update spamassassin to
3.4.0
he sending
server is responsible for delivering the rejection message.
But spampd has a default message size limit of 65536 bytes, and I have
found that increasing it causes memory problems on my server. So I've
been rejecting all email over that size with the postfix main.cf option:
message_siz
Hello,
Please forgive me, if this question is more related to the glue than to SA
itself.
I have a mail server with low to moderate traffic.
Here is my setup:
Postfix invokes SA through the spam proxy daemon (spampd) in a setup so that
inbound spam can be rejected during the smtp
Hi
I'm using spampd as a before filter with Postfix and it works really well...
except...
There is one specific message someone is trying to send to me, it has 4 or 5
Mb of pdf attachments and every time it hits my mail server it times out.
The thing that is strange is the first thing s
ep. That's the main trade-off between site-wide and per-user scanning.
Resource usage versus personalization.
I guess spampd as it stands wouldn't do this.
But could it serve as a starting point to do this?
What you'd have to do is take an input message, then for each recipient
x27;s the main trade-off between site-wide and per-user scanning.
Resource usage versus personalization.
> I guess spampd as it stands wouldn't do this.
> But could it serve as a starting point to do this?
What you'd have to do is take an input message, then for each recipient scan
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was looking at using spampd for my content_filter in postfix and found
> a comment in the debian package description that this is not suitable
> for use with a per-user Bayesian filtering configuration.
>
> I wa
I was looking at using spampd for my content_filter in postfix and found
a comment in the debian package description that this is not suitable
for use with a per-user Bayesian filtering configuration.
I wanted to confirm that this was still valid or not.
I eventually intend on setting up a
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:16:39AM -0400, Richmond Dyes wrote:
> spamassassin on another pc and using spampd as my proxy, I am relaying
[...]
> Any ideas?
Since spampd is not part of SpamAssassin, I'd suggest asking on their
mailing list.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
What is the
I am running postfix on my emailserver with Vams antivirus. I have put
spamassassin on another pc and using spampd as my proxy, I am relaying
email from postfix and vams to the spampd proxy back to the email
server. I keep getting the error below. it doesn't seem to be
affecting my
ends on how much memory you
have, what other programs are running, and how much memory your spampd
processes are using. Do what I suggested previously. Watch your
memory usage and adjust the number of children up or down until you
stop using swap. Once SA starts swapping, your performance goes dow
From: Dennis Teel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 08:05 AM 8/15/2006, you wrote:
> >
> > Dennis Teel wrote:
> > > Is anyone out there using spampd? I've been trying to setup a
> > > Spamassassin relay mail server and I'm really having performan
Dennis Teel wrote:
> Is anyone out there using spampd? I've been trying to setup a
> Spamassassin relay mail server and I'm really having performance
> issues. Our incoming MTA is averaging about 3 message per second. I
> would think that Spamassassin could keep up with that
Dennis Teel wrote:
Is anyone out there using spampd? I've been trying to setup a
Spamassassin relay mail server and I'm really having performance issues.
Our incoming MTA is averaging about 3 message per second. I would think
that Spamassassin could keep up with that just fine. Is a
Is anyone out there using spampd? I've been trying to setup a
Spamassassin relay mail server and I'm really having performance
issues. Our incoming MTA is averaging about 3 message per second. I
would think that Spamassassin could keep up with that just fine. Is
anyone else havin
15 matches
Mail list logo
