Re: spamd not well after crash

2006-08-07 Thread John Andersen
On Monday 07 August 2006 03:32, Loren Wilton wrote: > If you previously installed from a distro of some kind you should probably > upgrade using the newer distro rather than CPAN directly; otherwise you can > end up with mucked up installations since some distros move things around. The problem wi

Re: spamd not well after crash

2006-08-07 Thread Loren Wilton
It would be easier to fire up CPAN and install the latest than to try and figure it out. You are back level 2 or 4 releases. If you previously installed from a distro of some kind you should probably upgrade using the newer distro rather than CPAN directly; otherwise you can end up with mucke

Re: spamd not well after crash

2006-08-07 Thread kalin mintchev
> > Horked Bayes database? > > It would be easier to fire up CPAN and install the latest than to > try and figure it out. You are back level 2 or 4 releases. ok. i'll be doing it. but we are using vpopmail with individual preferences for every user. does that mean that every single user has to st

Re: spamd not well after crash

2006-08-06 Thread John Andersen
On Sunday 06 August 2006 16:30, kalin mintchev wrote: > hi all... > > last week we had a power outage and our mail sever went down with it. the > spamd performance has been disappointing ever since. crap like "Re: > veaooVzlAGRA" is passing through without a hitch. here is what spamd added > to t

spamd not well after crash

2006-08-06 Thread kalin mintchev
hi all... last week we had a power outage and our mail sever went down with it. the spamd performance has been disappointing ever since. crap like "Re: veaooVzlAGRA" is passing through without a hitch. here is what spamd added to the headers: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-