Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-10 Thread Jari Fredrisson
On 10.10.2014 3:35, LuKreme wrote: > On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: > >>> >> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: >>> > I ran sa-update & sa-compile. > >>> >> Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? > >>> Of course it should. I assumed && w

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-09 Thread LuKreme
On 09 Oct 2014, at 18:35 , LuKreme wrote: > No, that is not what it says. > > $ man 1 bash > … > The control operators && and || denote AND lists and OR lists, > respectively. An AND list has the form Sorry for duplicating other’s posts, I replied to the original message out of the “replie

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-09 Thread LuKreme
> On 08 Oct 2014, at 16:23 , Duane Hill wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote: > >>> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: >>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: > I

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-09 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 18:08 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > But you don't do a -lint before restarting SA: if an update was to break > SA (like a big Perl syntax error in a rule, or you are working on a > plugin on your production system, you feel safe because as long as you > don't restart spamd, a

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
Martin, > I do something similar on my SA rules development system (I also have SA > installed on this laptop but it is normally not running, which has the > side effect of disabling the standard Fedora sa-update cron job because > this won't run sa-update if it can't find the spamd daemon). My mo

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-09 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 11:50 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > > /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/bin/sa-compile && > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart > > > > the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were > > successfully completed, correct? > Yes, tha

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, > /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/bin/sa-compile && > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart > > the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were > successfully completed, correct? Sorry for jumping in the conversation... I have solved that issue by calling sa-u

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 6:31:08 PM, Martin confabulated: > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote: >> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote: >> > >> > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run >> > sa-update and then restart spamd. In

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote: > On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote: > > > > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run > > sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update > > finishes running, regardless if t

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Amir Caspi
Looks like I'm late to the party. :-) --- Amir thumbed via iPhone > On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Amir Caspi wrote: > >> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote: >> >> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run >> sa-update and then restart spamd. In othe

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:38:20 PM, John wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote: >> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. > ...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited > with a zero status. && stops on failure. > try: > true && echo "wa

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Amir Caspi
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote: > > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run > sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update > finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not, > restart spamd. Unless I

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread RW
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:23:36 -0500 Duane Hill wrote: > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. && is a logical AND > Your cron says run > sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update > finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not, >

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:31:07 PM, Dave wrote: > On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote: >> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run >> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update >> finishes running, regardless if there was an up

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote: No. && is a way of chaining commands together. ...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited with a zero status. && stops on failure. try: true && echo "was true" false && echo "was false" If you want it to execute t

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Dave Warren
On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote: No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not, restart spamd. I thought that ; would chain

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> >>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: I ran sa-update & sa-compile. >> >>> Should sa-compile be run

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread LuKreme
> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: > >> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: >>> I ran sa-update & sa-compile. > >> Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? > >> I have a crontab entry: > >> 16 1 * *

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On October 8, 2014 5:56:54 AM LuKreme wrote: 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart should I add an sa-compile call? If the plugin for precompiled body rules is enabled yes, check plugins in pre file

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread RW
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:54 -0600 LuKreme wrote: > On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: > > I ran sa-update & sa-compile. > > Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? > > I have a crontab entry: > > 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update > && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restar

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-08 Thread Duane Hill
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: >> I ran sa-update & sa-compile. > Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? > I have a crontab entry: > 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update && > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd resta

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread LuKreme
On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote: > I ran sa-update & sa-compile. Should sa-compile be run after sa-update? I have a crontab entry: 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart should I add an sa-compile call? -- 'It's still a lie. Like the

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Jari Fredrisson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7.10.2014 20:38, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson: >> On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote: I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debi

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Jari Fredrisson: On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote: I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Jari Fredrisson
On 7.10.2014 20:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote: >> I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. >> >> root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start >> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or >

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 18:55 +0300, Jari Fredrisson wrote: > I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. > > root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start > Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or > timed out without signaling production of a PID fil

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Jari Fredrisson
On 7.10.2014 18:58, Axb wrote: > On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote: >> I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. >> >> root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start >> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or >> timed out without signali

Re: spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Axb
On 10/07/2014 05:55 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote: I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr

spamd does not start

2014-10-07 Thread Jari Fredrisson
I built SA 3.4 using cpan to my old Debian Squeeze-lts. root@hurricane:~# time service spamassassin start Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: child process [4868] exited or timed out without signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2960. real0m1.230s use

Re: spamd does not start

2004-12-04 Thread hodaka
ctually was a problem with Time::HiRes and Net::DNS) > > <> > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: xoops?? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:00 AM > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject

RE: spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread Smart,Dan
(actually was a problem with Time::HiRes and Net::DNS) <> > -Original Message- > From: xoops?? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:00 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: spamd does not start > > Hi, &g

Re: spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread alan premselaar
jdow wrote: (B> From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (B> To: "xoops$B (B> Cc: (B> Sent: 2004 December, 02, Thursday 23:27 (B> Subject: Re: spamd does not start (B> (B> (B> (B>>xoops$B> (B>>>Hi, (B>>>

Re: spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread hodaka
My IO::Socket version is 1.26 which is up to date, CPAN says. Alan, is my font readable in your screen ? Thanks. > > Hi, > > > > I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running > > qmail with qmail-queue patch. > > Having a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS="-

Re: spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread jdow
From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (BTo: "xoops$B (BCc: (BSent: 2004 December, 02, Thursday 23:27 (BSubject: Re: spamd does not start (B (B (B> xoops$B > Hi, (B> > (B> > I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22

Re: spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread alan premselaar
xoops$B Hi, (B> (B> I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running (B> qmail with qmail-queue patch. (B> Having a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS="-x -u spamd -H /home/spamd (B> -d": (B> (B> "Starting spamd: Bareword "SO_REUSEPORT" not allowed while

spamd does not start

2004-12-03 Thread xoops$B
Hi, (B (BI have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running (Bqmail with qmail-queue patch. (BHaving a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS="-x -u spamd -H /home/spamd (B-d": (B (B "Starting spamd: Bareword "SO_REUSEPORT" not allowed while "strict subs" in (Bu