Larry wrote:
Have you tried it with the -E switch?
The only way I can reproduce the return code, 98, is if I pass spamc a
valid, running, spamd host and give it /dev/null as input. Passing it a
bad hostname results, expectedly, in 68.
spamc -E -t 60 -d valid.spamd.server < /dev/null
Why you wou
Have you tried it with the -E switch?
L
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 4:09 PM
> Posted To: sa-users
> Conversation: spamc exit code 98
> Subject: RE: spamc exit code 98
>
> >
>
> I suspect some kind of timeout error (since I said "-t 60"
> and that's how log it took), but I'd like to be sure. I also
> notice that in this case the message size is close to the
> default maximum message size.
>
If it reaches the timeout, it will exit 74 (EX_IOERR).
Also, spamc wi
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Larry wrote:
> > What does it mean when spamc exits with an exit code of 98?
> >
> > I'm running version 3.0.2 and invoking spamc with
> >
> > spamc -E -t 60 -d blahblah.ornl.gov
>
> Are you sure it's 98 and not 68 (host name unknown), or 7
>
> What does it mean when spamc exits with an exit code of 98?
>
> I'm running version 3.0.2 and invoking spamc with
>
> spamc -E -t 60 -d blahblah.ornl.gov
>
Spamc exit codes...
EX_USAGE64 command line usage error
EX_DATAERR 65 data format error
Larry wrote:
What does it mean when spamc exits with an exit code of 98?
I'm running version 3.0.2 and invoking spamc with
spamc -E -t 60 -d blahblah.ornl.gov
Are you sure it's 98 and not 68 (host name unknown), or 78 (config
error)? Neither spamc nor spamd have an exit code of 98 anywhere in the
What does it mean when spamc exits with an exit code of 98?
I'm running version 3.0.2 and invoking spamc with
spamc -E -t 60 -d blahblah.ornl.gov