On Saturday 24 March 2007 23:04, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The learn-spam script looks like this:
>
> /usr/bin/spamc -d euclid.ctyme.com -x -t 15 -L spam > /dev/null 2> /dev/null
> /bin/echo "" > /dev/null
>
> The echo command is just there so it returns a "0" and exim doesn't
> complain. Probably a b
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Trying to set up spamc/spamd learning. Have a dedicated spamd server
> that is fed from several MTA machines running exim. On the exim side
> I'm piping messages into spamc as follows:
>
> unseen pipe "/etc/exim/scripts/learn-spam"
>
> The learn-spam script looks like this:
>
>
Trying to set up spamc/spamd learning. Have a dedicated spamd server
that is fed from several MTA machines running exim. On the exim side I'm
piping messages into spamc as follows:
unseen pipe "/etc/exim/scripts/learn-spam"
The learn-spam script looks like this:
/usr/bin/spamc -d euclid.ctyme
Since 90% of users use outlook/outlook express, how do they report
their spam to you? Put differently, how do you extract spam out of
outlook and outlook express mailboxes?
Sergei,
This may help:
http://daesoft.com/SpamSource/
On Montag, 22. Mai 2006 17:46 Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Since 90% of users use outlook/outlook express, how do they report
> their spam to you? Put differently, how do you extract spam out of
> outlook and outlook express mailboxes?
IMAP Account. Or see http://www.olspamcop.org/
mfg zmi
--
// Mi
> We use site-wise bayes here too. While users can report FN's and FP's,
> IT staff reviews the submissions prior to actual learning. This prevents
Since 90% of users use outlook/outlook express, how do they report
their spam to you? Put differently, how do you extract spam out of
outlook and outl
On Montag, 22. Mai 2006 17:28 Bret Miller wrote:
> Either that or the other 95% of users get no spam ever.
*bruahaha* I just spit that nice coffee over my keyboard...
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531 .netw
> On Montag, 22. Mai 2006 01:12 Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> > But I'm reading everywhere that it's not a paricularly good idea.
>
> There's not a single answer to whether which method is best. I use a
> sitewide bayes, and it works good.
>
> sitewide:
> + spam learned helps all users
> + good when tr
On Montag, 22. Mai 2006 01:12 Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> But I'm reading everywhere that it's not a paricularly good idea.
There's not a single answer to whether which method is best. I use a
sitewide bayes, and it works good.
sitewide:
+ spam learned helps all users
+ good when trained with 100%
All right, I figured out the problem below by just adding bayes_path to
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf. So, now I have a shared bayes db. But I'm
reading everywhere that it's not a paricularly good idea. So, the
question is, how do I with the same setup (exim, etc), make spamd setuid
to the recipient o
Hello,
I started piping my mail through SA a couple of months ago and I've
been diligently marking messages as spam for the bayes subsystem. Then I
noticed that neither the headers of messages nor the analysis reports
have anything about bayes rules.
I'm running exim and here's what I have in t
11 matches
Mail list logo
