Loren Wilton writes:
> Ok. Sounds like they removed some base rules we were depending on. Maybe
> time to remove those rules based on them, or recreate the base rules as our
> own.
Feel free to recreate them; 3.2.x will efficiently merge duplicates
anyway so it won't have any runtime effect.
Unless all of those SARE rules chain back to standard SA rules that have
been removed, it may indicate that you have a higher-numbered part of one
of
the multi-part rule sets, and don't have the lower-numbered parts. In
many
cases there are base rules in the .0 or .1 files that are used by
hig
> On Friday 10 August 2007, Loren Wilton wrote:
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
>>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has
>>> unde
On Friday 10 August 2007, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
>> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
>> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
>> [10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined depen
[10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT'
[10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT'
[10637] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency
'SARE_RD_SAFE_TINY'
[10637] info: rules: meta test HS_
noticed this in the debug output while upgrading
[10637] dbg: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[10637] info: rules: meta test FM__TIMES_2 has dependency
'FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D' with a zero score
[10637] info: rules: meta test FM_SEX_HOST has dependency
'F
