On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Matthew van Eerde whispered secretively:
> mouss wrote:
>> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
>
> Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
mount --bind and/or subtree sharing will of course do the t
Thomas Hochstein wrote:
mouss schrieb:
Use the 'REPORT' or 'REPORT_IFSPAM' spamd command instead of 'SYMBOLS'
or 'PROCESS' to get the full score report but not the full message.
This requires parsing the message.
I would like getting something like:
ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44,MISSING_SUBJECT=1.345
mouss schrieb:
>> Use the 'REPORT' or 'REPORT_IFSPAM' spamd command instead of 'SYMBOLS'
>> or 'PROCESS' to get the full score report but not the full message.
>
> This requires parsing the message.
>
> I would like getting something like:
>
> ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44,MISSING_SUBJECT=1.345
Why don't you
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Windows does not have anything like UNIX domain sockets. The
>> closest thing to it would be a TCP server listening on 127.0.0.1
>> and only accepting connections from 127.0.0.1 - but that has the
>> same overhead as any o
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> >> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot
> >> less.
> >
> > ... any 3rd party tool to enhance and/or speed up window's built-in sockets?
>
> Windows does no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can probably set that up in local.cf with
clear_report_template
report _TESTSSCORES(,)_
That works. Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
symlinks are relative to the chroot. so
# ln -s /etc/foo /var/chroot/app/etc/foo
doesn't work (beca
mouss wrote:
> I would like getting something like:
>
> ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44,MISSING_SUBJECT=1.345
>
> instead of (REPORT):
>
> blahblah
> ...
> ...
> Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
Another thing is that I can't find a way to get the SA headers (as they
would be added by spamassassin) without having the full message sent
back (SYMBOLS doesn't return the score of each test). or am I missing
something?
Use the 'REPORT'
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in
>> disjoint jails
>
> Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount
> --bind?
/me comes to his senses
Of course you can't symlink out of a jail, duh
--
Matthew.van.
mouss wrote:
> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Eng
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot
>> less.
>
> ... any 3rd party tool to enhance and/or speed up window's built-in sockets?
Windows does not have anything like UNIX domain sockets. The closest thing t
Justin Mason wrote:
Adam Lanier writes:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to g
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
> Another thing is that I can't find a way to get the SA headers (as they
> would be added by spamassassin) without having the full message sent
> back (SYMBOLS doesn't return the score of each test). or am I missing
> something?
Use the 'REPORT' or 'REPORT_IFSPA
Justin Mason wrote:
> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot less.
I confess, I don't use SA... but I've frequented this list for a long time
because I respect that expertise of SA users.
Anyway... the mail server software I use runs on Windows 2003 and, recently,
thi
Adam Lanier writes:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
> > My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
> > this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
> > using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
> > a
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
> My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
> this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
> using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
> a response/spam score from the se
My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
a response/spam score from the server. Is there any other way to
promt a response from the serv
Matt Kettler wrote:
Kenneth Kim wrote:
I've found that SpamAssassin will not return a score until I close
socket writing. Once i've closed the writing, in order to get a score
for the next message, I have to reopen the connection in php to send
another message to SA. I hope I'm wrong about this,
Kenneth Kim wrote:
> I've found that SpamAssassin will not return a score until I close
> socket writing. Once i've closed the writing, in order to get a score
> for the next message, I have to reopen the connection in php to send
> another message to SA. I hope I'm wrong about this, but currently
I've found that SpamAssassin will not return a score until I close
socket writing. Once i've closed the writing, in order to get a score
for the next message, I have to reopen the connection in php to send
another message to SA. I hope I'm wrong about this, but currently I'm
bottle necking at becau
21 matches
Mail list logo
