Stefan Jakobs wrote on Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:06:47 +0200:
> It is a dbm db! The server process ~ 80 000 Mails per Day and the bayes_seen
> db is 5 month old.
If you count both dbs together 1 GB might be what you end up with this volume
and no expiry. What's your "salearn --dump magic" output? That
Hallo,
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2006 22:31 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Stefan Jakobs wrote on Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:56:22 +0200:
> > I turned on bayes autolearning with the standard options, but my
> > bayes_seen db grows and grows, now it is by 1.1 GB.
>
> This is indeed very much. This is a dbm db? (SQL
Stefan Jakobs wrote on Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:56:22 +0200:
> I turned on bayes autolearning with the standard options, but my bayes_seen
> db
> grows and grows, now it is by 1.1 GB.
This is indeed very much. This is a dbm db? (SQL has bigger sizes because of
indexing.) How much mail do you process
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
I'm using SA 3.1.2 with amavis-new and postfix on a mailrelay.
I turned on bayes autolearning with the standard options, but my bayes_seen db
grows and grows, now it is by 1.1 GB.
Why reduce SA the size not automatically?
Probably because its automatic expiry runs are get
Hello list,
I'm using SA 3.1.2 with amavis-new and postfix on a mailrelay.
I turned on bayes autolearning with the standard options, but my bayes_seen db
grows and grows, now it is by 1.1 GB.
Why reduce SA the size not automatically?
What can I do, to reduce the size of the db?
What are your exp
I have a sitewide bayes DB that I'm
using and am wondering if having too large of a Bayes DB reduces it's efficiency?
I normally don't look at SA too much unless users start complaining
about misclassified mail. But as Joanne pointed out in a different
thread, my Bayes DB seems to be trained rat
