Re: shortcircuit dnsbl/uribl

2015-06-03 Thread RW
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:22:42 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 02.06.2015 um 16:30 schrieb RW: > > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:36:07 +0200 > > Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> given that USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST score with -100 here there is no > >> real point to fire up all the other tests, it's clear anyw

Re: shortcircuit dnsbl/uribl

2015-06-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.06.2015 um 16:30 schrieb RW: On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:36:07 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: given that USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST score with -100 here there is no real point to fire up all the other tests, it's clear anyways that this message will pass As far as possible spamassassin does network

Re: shortcircuit dnsbl/uribl

2015-06-02 Thread RW
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:36:07 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > given that USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST score with -100 here there is no > real point to fire up all the other tests, it's clear anyways that > this message will pass As far as possible spamassassin does network test in parallel with each other

shortcircuit dnsbl/uribl

2015-06-02 Thread Reindl Harald
is there a way to skip DNSBL/URIBL if a message hits the rule below, i tried to define dnsbl-rules with "priority CUST_DNSBL -450" but that don't change anything given that USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST score with -100 here there is no real point to fire up all the other tests, it's clear anyways that