On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:47:05 -0600
Jesse Norell wrote:
> Hmm, ok. Without "hapaxes" enabled, how many hits on a token do you
> need for it to start being useful?
Don't disable hapaxes without good empirical evidence that it provides
you with a benefit. Typically it reduces accuracy without any
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:36 +0200, Axb wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 11:17 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >Looking at recent botnet spam, comparing messages from one day to the
> > next, I see new URL's being advertised that resolve to the same IP
> > address as ones in the past. Eg. some a
On 09/03/2014 11:17 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
Looking at recent botnet spam, comparing messages from one day to the
next, I see new URL's being advertised that resolve to the same IP
address as ones in the past. Eg. some at http://pastie.org/9525224
The first of those was already on UR
Hello,
Looking at recent botnet spam, comparing messages from one day to the
next, I see new URL's being advertised that resolve to the same IP
address as ones in the past. Eg. some at http://pastie.org/9525224
The first of those was already on URIBL/RBL lists when it hit, but the
others were
