Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
too just for good measure) >> chown gene:gene /var/log/fetchmail.log >> # to let the disks synch >> sleep 6 >> runuser -l gene -c "fetchmail -d 90 --fetchmailrc /home/gene/.fetchmailrc" >> >> as can be seen, the mail delivery system al

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
-l gene -c "fetchmail -d 90 --fetchmailrc /home/gene/.fetchmailrc" as can be seen, the mail delivery system all runs as the user gene. So, in light of this, I should be running saupdate as gene, not as a separate user. Thanks for the forehead slap Bowie, I needed

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>> If permissions are 0700 and sa-update cannot read the directory, then >>> sa-update is not running as the user "saupdate". Double-check which

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
Gene Heskett wrote: On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote: If permissions are 0700 and sa-update cannot read the directory, then sa-update is not running as the user "saupdate". Double-check which user sa-update runs as and chown the directory to that user. Here i

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
keys' >>>> >>>> And ls -l returns: >>>> [r...@coyote linux-2.6.30.2]# ls -l /var/lib/spamassassin >>>> total 16 >>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 saupdate saupdate 4096 2009-07-21 02:45 3.002005 >>>> drwx--x--x 2 saupdate mail 4096 2009-07

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
drwxr-xr-x 3 saupdate saupdate 4096 2009-07-21 02:45 3.002005 drwx--x--x 2 saupdate mail 4096 2009-07-21 02:45 keys So what should the perms be on this directory? AFAIR gnupg expects 0700 as permissions for the directory. Regards, Sebastian I had that set once, and just re

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
amassassin >> total 16 >> drwxr-xr-x 3 saupdate saupdate 4096 2009-07-21 02:45 3.002005 >> drwx--x--x 2 saupdate mail 4096 2009-07-21 02:45 keys >> >> So what should the perms be on this directory? > >AFAIR gnupg expects 0700 as permissions for the directory.

Re: Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Gene Heskett [2009-07-21 14:11]: > The gist is: > gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/var/lib/spamassassin/keys' > > And ls -l returns: > [r...@coyote linux-2.6.30.2]# ls -l /var/lib/spamassassin > total 16 > drwxr-xr-x 3 saupdate saupdate 4096 2009-07-21 0

Newly made warning from saupdate

2009-07-21 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings all; I've just started to get an email from saupdate, mainly because I didn't have a forwarding alias properly setup before. The gist is: gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/var/lib/spamassassin/keys' And ls -l returns: [r...@coyote linux-2.6.30.2]#

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Jack Gostl
- Original Message - From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "spamassassin" Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 3:01 PM Subject: Re: saupdate Jack Gostl wrote: - Original Message - Fro

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Craig Morrison
Jack Gostl wrote: - Original Message - From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "spamassassin" Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: saupdate Please keep replies on the list fo

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Jack Gostl
- Original Message - From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "spamassassin" Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: saupdate Please keep replies on the list for the benefit of othe

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Craig Morrison
Please keep replies on the list for the benefit of others.. Comments inline.. Jack Gostl wrote: Question 2: After running saupdate, I assume that all I have to do is to restart spamd. How can I force spamd to restart and reload its rules? Can a do a simple kill -1? Or do I need an

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Jason Frisvold
On 11/23/06, Jack Gostl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to understand saupdate and how to use it. I have two questions. I'm running AIX 5.3. Question 2: After running saupdate, I assume that all I have to do is to restart spamd. How can I force spamd to restart and

Re: saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Craig Morrison
Jack Gostl wrote: I'm trying to understand saupdate and how to use it. I have two questions. I'm running AIX 5.3. Question 1: I run the following command: /usr/opt/perl5/bin/sa-update --nogpg -D --updatedir /tmp/update It finishes with a return code of 1. It sounds to me like

saupdate

2006-11-23 Thread Jack Gostl
I'm trying to understand saupdate and how to use it. I have two questions. I'm running AIX 5.3. Question 1: I run the following command: /usr/opt/perl5/bin/sa-update --nogpg -D --updatedir /tmp/update It finishes with a return code of 1. It sounds to me like something failed. I