Paul Schmehl skrev den 2024-06-22 07:44:
It’s not clear to me from your answer. Does SA read rules in both
places?
it eveal first sa-update rules, then later host rules
Or only in /etc/mail/spamassassin/?
this is host rules, you define all global configs here, and it will
never be overrid
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024, Paul Schmehl wrote:
On Jun 22, 2024, at 12:28 AM, Kenneth Porter
wrote:
On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the
web. Sure enough, that’s where the rules
go. Is that where my local.c
> On Jun 22, 2024, at 12:28 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the web.
>> Sure enough, that’s where the rules go. Is that where my local.cf file
>> should be located? Right now it’s in /et
On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the
web. Sure enough, that’s where the rules go. Is that where my local.cf
file should be located? Right now it’s in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
There’s a default local.cf file in /var/lib/….
I just ran sa-updates. Then I looked in /etc/mail/spamassassin to see if the
rules had been updated, and none of them had today’s date on them
So, I downloaded the tar file, unzipped it, and searched for one of the files.
I found them in /var/lib/spamassassin/….
I scratched my head, then
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Alex wrote:
As John said, masschecks is being starved. How far off is it from
being sufficiently populated?
You can always visit the masscheck home page and hover over the stats to
see the latest submitted corpus size. Last run was 102k spam, 203k ham.
The minimum to pub
Hi,
>> I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
>> weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
>
> i noticed that long ago - look in the list archives also for the responses
Yes, I recall, but still nothing is being done to make a major
component of
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, Alex wrote:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
The masscheck spam corpus has been starved. Possibly due to the holidays,
though I can't say for sure.
This is a significant
Am 16.01.2016 um 19:38 schrieb Alex:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
i noticed that long ago - look in the list archives also for the responses
This is a significant part of what makes spama
Alex skrev den 2016-01-16 19:38:
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
more masscheckers wont hurt anyone
This is a significant part of what makes spamassassin so great. Is
there no one else that h
Hi,
I've noticed there hasn't been any rule updates in at least three
weeks. Any idea what's going on? Is it lacking masschecks samples?
This is a significant part of what makes spamassassin so great. Is
there no one else that has a regular spam/ham stream that can
contribute?
On 4/24/15 3:52 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
On 4/24/15 2:22 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own
reports to Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes
other than
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
On 4/24/15 2:22 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own reports
to Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes
other than downloading new rules. Why is this ha
On 4/24/15 2:22 PM, David B Funk wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own
reports to Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes
other than downloading new rules. Why is this happening?
Everything has been workin
On 4/24/2015 1:10 PM, Forrest wrote:
> Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own
> reports to Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes
> other than downloading new rules. Why is this happening?
> Everything has been working for literally years.
> spam.spam
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Forrest wrote:
Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own reports to
Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes
other than downloading new rules. Why is this happening? Everything has
been working for literally years. spam.spamcop.ne
Since last night, suddenly Spamassassin/Milter is rejecting my own
reports to Spamcop. Out of nowhere and with no other changes other than
downloading new rules. Why is this happening? Everything has been
working for literally years. spam.spamcop.net is whitelisted in both
the system a
I know is one of the old ones. This leads me to think I have
succeeded in eliminating some false positives, at least.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/SA-using-wrong-set-of-sa-updates-tp114062p114081.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>UPDATE: I figured-out how to run a command-line scan using 'spamassassin
-D'
>which showed that it was using the old c.2011 rules in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/saupdates_openprotect_com. How do I fix
that?
If you have no intention to use 3rd party rules, I think you can just delete
that dir
o I fix
that?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/SA-using-wrong-set-of-sa-updates-tp114062.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 12/12/2011 6:17 AM, numberxiii wrote:
Hi
We encountered a problem with sa-update since the last week-end.
It fails with this error :
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/tmp/.spamassassin32504f7H7V4tmp/72_active.cf": uridnsblURIBL_SBL_A
sbl.spamhaus.org. A
May be it's relat
sues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6696
Anybody has got the same error ?
I'm using spamassassin 3.3.1.
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sa-updates-failures-since-few-days-%3A-failed-to-parse-line-URIBL_SBL_A-tp32958554p32958554.html
Sent from the
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:01:34 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
> > to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep
> > a copy for processing in the mass checks.
>
> No.
On 03/10/2011 11:49 AM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
>> I figure spam capped at 15+ points would be fine, but you'll need
>> developer consensus on that.
>>
>
> Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
> to the corpus? If not, I'm ce
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> >On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
> >>Spam is easy to get, diverse ham much less so.
> >
> >That's funny, since the sa-updates are currently not happening due to a
> >l
/201101.mbox/%3c4d40f924.3070...@dostech.ca%3E
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
Spam is easy to get, diverse ham much less so.
That's funny, since the sa-updates are currently not happening due to a
lack of spam.
Odd. Those stats aren't reflected on the ruleqa page. Where are you
ge
On 03/10, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Wouldn't spam already scored at 15+ be considered a little redundant
> to the corpus? If not, I'm certain I could modify my config to keep
> a copy for processing in the mass checks.
No. If all spams scored 15+ hit similar tests, and none of those spams are
inclu
On 2011/03/10 2:17 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high
scoring spam.
After Reading these wiki articles:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Co
On 03/10/2011 07:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I'd be happy to contribute, but we bounce or outright delete high
> scoring spam.
>
> After Reading these wiki articles:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CorpusCleaning
> I get the impr
tely a problem.
On 03/10, John Hardin wrote:
> Spam is easy to get, diverse ham much less so.
That's funny, since the sa-updates are currently not happening due to a
lack of spam.
Also, I agree that https://fedorahosted.org/auto-mass-check/ is a better
place to go for participating in t
On 2011/03/10 10:59 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new
rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still
trying to figure out how I can rearrange my conf
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adam Moffett wrote:
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new rules.
There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still trying to
figure out how I can rearrange my conf
Discussion on the dev list points to a lack of sufficient ham in the
corpus which is necessary to generate score updates and publish new
rules. There was a recent drive for new submitters, but I'm still
trying to figure out how I can rearrange my configuration in order to
help.
http://wiki
On 2011/03/10 6:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what
On 3/10/2011 1:41 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I
On 3/10/2011 1:41 PM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when?
Regards to all
Nigel
Why fix whats not broken :o)
regards
Tom
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when?
Regards to all
Nigel
C. Bensend wrote:
Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
update
> Then you haven't been getting the regular updates. If you don't have
> updates.spamassassin.org in your --channelfile, it won't check it...
No, I stand corrected, sorry for the misinformation. At the very
top of the file (they had scrolled out of my term), I have:
updates.spamassassin.org
so
On 8/19/10 7:49 AM, "C. Bensend" wrote:
>
>> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
>> and never will.
>>
>> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
>> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
>> SARE.
> better - *don't even think of using them* - they are not being updated
> and never will.
>
> Anything worthy has already been migrated to SA mainstream and the few
> SARE survivors are also SA commiters so they'll commit to SA instead of
> SARE.
>
> Anybody hammering the rulesemporium with lwp/w
On 2010-08-18 14:05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt
BE sareful about SARE rules. They are often obsolete, have false positives
and meny of them are already incorporated in stock SA, and some have better
alternatives (uri blacklist vs. hardcode
On 17.08.10 10:06, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I found out the above when trying to use the following howto for SARE
> rule updates: http://www.topdog.za.net/configure_spamassassin.
>
> #
> r...@warpath:~# sa-update --import GPG.KEY
> gpg: keyblock resource `/etc/
LOL, yep, I am retarded. Thanks!
Any ideas on the sa-update question/concern?
Thanks,
Mark
On 08/17/2010 11:17 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:06:41 -0500
Mark Chaney wrote:
Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
exact same files with the same modified da
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:06 -0500, Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing something).
>
One could be a hard link s
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:06:41 -0500
Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing
> something).
> r...@warpath:~# ls -
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 10:06 -0500, Mark Chaney wrote:
> Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
> exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
> symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing something).
> r...@warpath:~# ls -l /etc
Why do I have two spamassassin directories? They seem to have the
exact same files with the same modified dates, yet I dont see any
symlinking going on (though I easily could be blind and missing something).
###
r...@warpath:~# ls -l /etc/mail/spamassas
I appreciate that you would like to see it working right, Daryl. To
that, I'd add, "me, too." But, like I said, I had to move on, and I
hope to get back to it soon. And, by the way, I played with setting
the update paths to all kinds of places, and all kinds of
permissions, too. ;-) I'm sure
Andy Norris wrote:
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it soon,
but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my server.
There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure sa-update
works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had to
No, it was not a permissions issue. I'll get back to working on it
soon, but, yes there were newer versions than what I was seeing on my
server. There are so many posts about sa-update not working. I'm sure
sa-update works, for some folks, but it wasn't for me, and I had to
quit spending time
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
So a down and
dirty approach I took was writing a crop job that removes that
directory just before running sa-update.
So, you delete it every time, even when there are no updates? And since
updates occur about
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:35 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this is relevant for you or not, but on our mail
> server I could not get sa-update to work, either. I noticed that if
> the directory was not there, however, it would work.
Sounds like a permissions issue.
>
inal Message-
> From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2007 13:30
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Custom rules working, but not sa-updates
>
>
> Boy, that's a handy command. I'll have to write that one down.
>
> I&
October 2007 12:29
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Custom rules working, but not sa-updates
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your response Phil,
>>
>> In an attempt to resolve the issue, I'm now using MailScanner
>> 4.64.3 and
>> hav
ug --debug-sa
output say it is using?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2007 12:29
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Custom rules working, but not sa
g?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
> --
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 30 October 2007 12:29
>> To: users@spamassassin.apach
t; To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Custom rules working, but not sa-updates
>
>
> Thanks for your response Phil,
>
> In an attempt to resolve the issue, I'm now using MailScanner
> 4.64.3 and
> have started from a fresh config file, so my "Spam
re Council
> Hereford, UK
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 30 October 2007 11:54
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Custom rules working, but not sa-updates
>>
>>
>> I
Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Starr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2007 11:54
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Custom rules working, but not sa-updates
>
>
> I should
il/
> spamassassin that always works.
>
> I've been troubleshooting for quite a while now and can't figure out
> why the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003/ rules just aren't being used.
> Any troubleshooting tips would be greatly appreciated. Just let me
>
y familiar with faite l'amour, but doesn't that mean the
certificate is expired? If so, the channel maintainer should renew it.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 09:21
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
-
From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 09:21
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Problemes with sa-updates
Hi
i have a lot of server with spamassassin 3.1.7 what sa-update work
perfectly.
But on one server, i have this error:
[7053] dbg: gpg:
Hi
i have a lot of server with spamassassin 3.1.7 what sa-update work
perfectly.
But on one server, i have this error:
[7053] dbg: gpg: populating temp signature file
[7053] dbg: gpg: calling gpg
[7053] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature faite le mer 22 nov 2006 00:58:01 CET
avec la clé RSA ID 24F434C
64 matches
Mail list logo
