Stephan,
The type for the update record is a TXT not an A record, so dig -t txt
3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org.
I'm not sure if an update has failed for the past 2 days though so this
is just a comment on how to check manually.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3600 IN TXT
It queries TXT records
$ dig TXT 2.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org
;; ANSWER SECTION:
2.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 3424 IN CNAME 3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org.
3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org. 79 IN TXT "1879105"
It is normal that updates might be stale for a few days sometimes. Use
"
Hi everyone,
Our SpamAssassin rules have not gotten any recent updates (looks like
past 2 days). When investigating, sa-update tries to connect to:
2.4.3.updates.spamassassin.org
When doing a DNS lookup on this hostname it appears to be a CNAME which
points to: 3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.or
Tried that when I read Kevin's message. It failed, until I unset a
http_proxy env variable, which I'v now tracked down and eliminated.
Everything is working fine now, thanks
On 30/03/17 13:40, RW wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:45:59 +0100
Terry Stewart wrote:
Hi
I'm having trouble using s
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:45:59 +0100
Terry Stewart wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm having trouble using sa-update where it says "channel: could not
> find working mirror, channel failed".
>
> Mar 29 12:36:28.914 [12498] dbg: http: /usr/sfw/bin/wget -q
> --max-redirect=2 --tries=3 --dns-timeout=20 --connect
Hi Kevin
Thanks, that was an easy one. For some reason the shell had a http
proxy set (though I couldn't see this when I ran env) So unset
http_proxy fixed it. Now all I have to do is track down where this is
coming from, but that's my problem nothing to do with sa-update.
Regards
Terry
On 3/30/2017 5:45 AM, Terry Stewart wrote:
Mar 29 12:36:28.814 [12498] dbg: channel: found mirror
http://sa-update.dnswl.org/ weight=1
Mar 29 12:36:28.814 [12498] dbg: channel: found mirror
http://www.sa-update.pccc.com/ weight=5
Mar 29 12:36:28.815 [12498] dbg: channel: found mirror
http://sa-
Hi
I'm having trouble using sa-update where it says "channel: could not
find working mirror, channel failed".
I'm running this on a Solaris 10 server. DNS works fine (the mail
server also acts as our DNS server) as below
nslookup http://sa-update.space-pro.be
Non-authoritative answer:
Nam
On Nov 22, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Larry Starr wrote:
> For the past few days my daily "sa-update" job has been failing:
Please do not post tiny styled HTML messages. While 9pt text may look great on
your system, forcing that horrendous choice on others should be avoided.
On *my* screen with my eyes
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 18:34:05 bOnK wrote:
> On 22-11-2016 18:22, Larry Starr wrote:
> > Has there been a mirror change that I've missed?
>
> > For the past few days my daily "sa-update" job has been failing:
> I don't know if this has anything to do with your problem, but there is
> a s
On 22-11-2016 18:22, Larry Starr wrote:
Has there been a mirror change that I've missed?
For the past few days my daily "sa-update" job has been failing:
I don't know if this has anything to do with your problem, but there is
a sync problem with the master and slave DNS servers.
--
b.
Has there been a mirror change that I've missed?
For the past few days my daily "sa-update" job has been failing:
Update available for channel updates.spamassassin.org
channel: no 'mirrors.70_sare_adult.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net' record found,
channel failed
channel: no 'mirrors.70_sare_baye
Hi Mark,
Thanks very much - you were spot on! I had noticed the file there, but
didn't think it was unusual. But I've now deleted the file (along the the
associated .asc and .sha1 files which were also there), and sa-update now
works again.
Many thanks for your help.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:17
Tim Taylor wrote:
For the last few days (from 31 Jan 2015), sa-update has been failing on
my
server. I've checked and can't see that any package updates happened
around
then, so I'm puzzled by why this is happening (it's been working fine
for
over a year beforehand).
I'm running sa-update ver
For the last few days (from 31 Jan 2015), sa-update has been failing on my
server. I've checked and can't see that any package updates happened around
then, so I'm puzzled by why this is happening (it's been working fine for
over a year beforehand).
I'm running sa-update version svn1475932 (with P
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
(I hear the publishing mechanism now allows for scores set in the
sandboxes to act as upper limits on published rules. That would solve
this issue.)
Confirmed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:49:36 -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
>> I fixed this yesterday and updates are now fully functional.
On 08/05/2011 07:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> super, i just noticed nopublis in the above file, is this intended ?
Short answer: Yes. The GA is too slow to publish them itself.
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:49:36 -0700, Adam Katz wrote:
On 07/23/2011 01:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:35:41 -0700 (PDT), Fenris wrote:
http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz
request
I fixed this yesterday and updates are now fully functional.
super, i
On 07/23/2011 01:05 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:35:41 -0700 (PDT), Fenris wrote:
>
> http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz request
> failed: 404 Not Found:
>
>> Sorry Adam, I'm still seeing the same problem this morning, for whatever
>> reason it
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:35:41 -0700 (PDT), Fenris wrote:
http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz request
failed: 404 Not Found:
Sorry Adam, I'm still seeing the same problem this morning, for
whatever
reason it's still asking for
the 21st June tar.gz that was causing the pro
Adam Katz-10 wrote:
>
> "Fenris" wrote
>>> Recently (for a few weeks I think) I've been seeing errors from my
>>> sa-update script, like this:
>>>
>>> /etc/cron.daily/sa-update:
>>>
>>> http: GET
>>> http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz request
>>> failed: 404 Not Foun
"Fenris" wrote
>> Recently (for a few weeks I think) I've been seeing errors from my
>> sa-update script, like this:
>>
>> /etc/cron.daily/sa-update:
>>
>> http: GET
>> http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz request
>> failed: 404 Not Found:
...
>> channel: could not find wo
"Fenris" wrote in message
news:32081598.p...@talk.nabble.com...
Recently (for a few weeks I think) I've been seeing errors from my
sa-update
script, like this:
/etc/cron.daily/sa-update:
http: GET http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz
request
failed: 404 Not Found: http://
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:50:45 -0700 (PDT), Fenris wrote:
khop-sc-neighbors
its just this channel missing on 3.3.2
d--compilation aborted at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS.pm line
> 67.
> Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/sa-update line 80.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 80.
>
> Searching for anything name2labels as it re
> from this? I have never seen an error like that before.
>
> Why are you running sa-update manually? The upstream RPM and
> SpamTips.org RPM (both designed by me) automatically run sa-update once
> per day if spamd is running.
>
> Warren Togami
> war...@togami.com
Recently (for a few weeks I think) I've been seeing errors from my sa-update
script, like this:
/etc/cron.daily/sa-update:
http: GET http://khopesh.com/sa/khop-sc-neighbors/2011062101.tar.gz request
failed: 404 Not Found: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xht
On 18/07/11 02:58, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 7/17/2011 7:55 AM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-07-17 18:32, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 7/16/2011 4:54 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/15, ssapp80 wrote:
Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
When I run sa-updat
On 7/17/2011 7:55 AM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-07-17 18:32, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 7/16/2011 4:54 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/15, ssapp80 wrote:
Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
When I run sa-update i receive the following failures on the Net
On 2011-07-17 18:32, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 7/16/2011 4:54 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/15, ssapp80 wrote:
Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
When I run sa-update i receive the following failures on the Net::DNS
module
"name2labels" is not
On 7/16/2011 4:54 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/15, ssapp80 wrote:
Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
When I run sa-update i receive the following failures on the Net::DNS module
"name2labels" is not exported by the Net::DNS module
My guess is
On 7/16/11 10:54 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
My guess is Net::DNS version 0.59 is too old. I
on freebsd, we specify a minimum version of Net-DNS>=0.63
Not sure if it was due to problems we knew about, or bug reports on this
list.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-22
On 07/15, ssapp80 wrote:
> Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
> perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
>
> When I run sa-update i receive the following failures on the Net::DNS module
>
> "name2labels" is not exported by the Net::DNS module
My guess is Net::DNS version 0.59 is too old. In which
On 7/15/2011 10:35 AM, ssapp80 wrote:
Running spamassassin-3.3.2 on CentOS 5.5
perl-Net-DNS ver 0.59 installed
When I run sa-update i receive the following failures on the Net::DNS module
"name2labels" is not exported by the Net::DNS module
Can't continue after import errors at
/usr/lib/perl5/
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sa-update-failing-tp32071145p32071145.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi!
Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running rc1,
but the errors have disappeared.
Ah okay perfect!
Thanks,
Raymond.
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:16:26 Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> > Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
>
> It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running
> rc1, but the errors have disappeared.
Yes, it's been fixed yesterday evening, but i
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Upgrade to SVN version this is a issue with RC1.
It looks to me like one of the devs fixed the rule. I'm still running
rc1, but the errors have disappeared.
Hi!
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/tmp/.spamassassin7365XWGL4Stmp/10_default_prefs.cf":
clear_originating_ip_headers
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/tmp/.spamassassin7365XWGL4Stmp/10_default_prefs.cf":
originating_ip_headers X-Yahoo-Post-IP X-Originating-IP
X-Apparentl
After working 2 days ago, sa-update has stopped working. When I run it
I get:
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/tmp/.spamassassin7365XWGL4Stmp/10_default_prefs.cf":
clear_originating_ip_headers
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
"/tmp/.spamassassin7365XWGL4Stmp/10_default_prefs
Justin Mason wrote:
[98652] dbg: http: GET request,
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/895075.tar.gz
[98652] dbg: http: GET request,
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/895075.tar.gz.sha1
[98652] dbg: http: GET request,
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/895075.tar.gz.asc
At a first gues
Very unusual. What do you get if you use "wget" or "curl" from the
command line to download those URLs:
[98652] dbg: http: GET request,
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/895075.tar.gz
[98652] dbg: http: GET request,
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/895075.tar.gz.sha1
[98652] dbg: http:
Hi,
I'm trying to update my rules with sa-update, and it is failing:
deliver3# sa-update -D
[98652] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[98652] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[98652] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
[98652] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.
[98652] dbg: dns: is Net::DN
Hi,
(apologies if this is a duplicate - I don't think it went through the
first time)
I'm trying to update my rules with sa-update, and it is failing:
deliver3# sa-update -D
[98652] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[98652] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[98652] dbg: generic: SpamAssassi
Jason Haar wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
24F434CE is the active subkey of 5244EC45:
...
sounds like your sa-update key info got lost somehow?
Yeah. This is a CentOS-4 server I installed yesterday. Looks like
something went wrong with it.
The error message says:
Perhaps you need to import th
Justin Mason wrote:
>
> 24F434CE is the active subkey of 5244EC45:
>
> ...
> sounds like your sa-update key info got lost somehow?
>
>
Yeah. This is a CentOS-4 server I installed yesterday. Looks like
something went wrong with it.
The error message says:
Perhaps you need to import the channel'
Jason Haar writes:
> Similar to the issue found Jan 1 2007, I am currently seeing
>
> # sa-update
> error: GPG validation failed!
> The update downloaded successfully, but it was not signed with a trusted GPG
> key. Instead, it was signed with the following keys:
>
> 24F434CE
>
> Perhaps y
Similar to the issue found Jan 1 2007, I am currently seeing
# sa-update
error: GPG validation failed!
The update downloaded successfully, but it was not signed with a trusted GPG
key. Instead, it was signed with the following keys:
24F434CE
Perhaps you need to import the channel's GPG key?
48 matches
Mail list logo
