On 2010-12-15 21:41, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/12/2010 3:51 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The khop rules are good. I thought the 2tld stuff had been pulled into
SA as 20_aux_tlds.cf?
It has, but the Daryl edited one has some additional stuff (I think)
that isn't in there. There is conditional co
On 2010-12-15 19:00, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
this has been deprecated and replaced with SA's default 20_aux_tlds.cf
See in: 20_aux_tlds.cf
# This file replaces the SARE http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.cf
# which will be deprecated as from
>> On 12/15/2010 11:57 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
>>> Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from
>>> 3.2.5 to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels
>>> that are still relevant but not with much success.
>>>
On 15/12/2010 3:51 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The khop rules are good. I thought the 2tld stuff had been pulled into
SA as 20_aux_tlds.cf?
It has, but the Daryl edited one has some additional stuff (I think)
that isn't in there. There is conditional code that enables certain
rules in the file dep
On 12/15/2010 1:00 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> On 15/12/2010 1:32 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 12/15/2010 11:57 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
>>> Sorry all,
>>>
>>> Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from
>>> 3.2.5 to 3.3.1.
On 15/12/2010 1:32 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 12/15/2010 11:57 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Sorry all,
Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from
3.2.5 to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels
that are still relevant but not with much success.
Does
On 12/15/2010 11:57 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> Sorry all,
>
> Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from
> 3.2.5 to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels
> that are still relevant but not with much success.
>
> Does anyone know
Sorry all,
Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from 3.2.5
to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels that are
still relevant but not with much success.
Does anyone know is such a list exists, or if you know of which additional
channels can still
On 21.4.2010 18:00, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl writes:
>
>> Micah Anderson wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:20:40 -0400:
>>
>>> saupdates.openprotect.com
>>
>> It's been said repeatedly on this list: don't use it.
>
> Thanks, should I be using the sought.rules.yerp.org channel instead, or
Kai Schaetzl writes:
> Micah Anderson wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:20:40 -0400:
>
>> saupdates.openprotect.com
>
> It's been said repeatedly on this list: don't use it.
Thanks, should I be using the sought.rules.yerp.org channel instead, or
some of the dostech ones?
micah
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> "90_2tld.cf has been replaced by the official rule file 20_aux_tlds.cf."
>
> I have this in my channels.txt that I use with sa-update.
>
> Is it enough to remove the channel, and the rule file disappears on next
> sa-update, or does the old remnant keep on ghosting on the
"90_2tld.cf has been replaced by the official rule file 20_aux_tlds.cf."
I have this in my channels.txt that I use with sa-update.
Is it enough to remove the channel, and the rule file disappears on next
sa-update, or does the old remnant keep on ghosting on the system forever?
--
http://www.i
On 2010-03-18 15:02, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 2010/03/17 6:20 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to find out what the current state of the art is for plugins
and channel updates.
For channels I've been using:
updates.spamassassin.org
sought.rules.yerp.org
saupdates.openprotect.com
But I won
On 2010/03/17 6:20 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to find out what the current state of the art is for plugins
and channel updates.
For channels I've been using:
updates.spamassassin.org
sought.rules.yerp.org
saupdates.openprotect.com
But I wonder if the last two are still relevant, or
Micah Anderson wrote on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:20:40 -0400:
> saupdates.openprotect.com
It's been said repeatedly on this list: don't use it.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I'm trying to find out what the current state of the art is for plugins
and channel updates.
What are people using now days? I just reviewed my plugins and ended up
deleting Freemail because it has been pulled into Spamassassin core;
removed the postcards plugin because the original source is now
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:33:42 +0200
"Mathias Homann" wrote:
> which good/useful sa-update channels should i use, in addition to
> these:
>
> saupdates.openprotect.com
> updates.spamassassin.org
> 70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
Try the Sought rules:
Hi,
which good/useful sa-update channels should i use, in addition to these:
saupdates.openprotect.com
updates.spamassassin.org
70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
thanks for any suggestions
MH
--
Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1
UWG und
Hi Daryl how are you? Just reviving an older thread here.
With the aid of the Victorian State Govt here in Oz, we have just fired
up an IPv6 TestBed to help organisations stage transition exercises etc
to IPv6. Vendors are starting to look favourably at the opportunity to
assist clients into the
At 19:30 28-11-2008, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
As an aside, I'd be interested to know how much, if any, spam you get to
your IPv6 only server. I had one for a short while a number or years
ago and didn't get any mail at all.
IPv6 usage depends on your environment and the user-base you are
dea
Hi Daryl, thanks for the quick response
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 22:30 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 28/11/2008 10:11 PM, George Fong wrote:
> > I suspect I have missed something simple but when I do sa-update --debug
> > it can't find spamassassin.apache.org for the updates. I am guessing
>
On 28/11/2008 10:11 PM, George Fong wrote:
> I suspect I have missed something simple but when I do sa-update --debug
> it can't find spamassassin.apache.org for the updates. I am guessing
> that this server only lives in Ipv4 Land?
Correct.
> If this is the case, is there an IPv6 repository that
I hope this is the right place to pose this question. Apologies in
advance if it isn't.
We have built an IPv6 only mail server. It connects only to IPv6Land.
Its our way of finally getting to grips with what the issues are and
will be.
I suspect I have missed something simple but when I do sa-upd
>
> Regarding sa-update, which channels are you using? I'm
> currently running on saupdates.openproect.com. Any
> suggestions on this subject?
I Use:
updates.spamassassin.org
00_FVGT_File001.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
99_FVGT_meta.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.sare.sa-upd
#x27;Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm).
Brief directions for use are as follows:
- download t
Hamish wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 20:53, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Hamish wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've
created sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the
SpamAssassin Rules Emporiu
On Thursday 17 August 2006 20:53, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Hamish wrote:
> > > > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I
Hamish wrote:
> > > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've
> > > > created sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the
> >
> > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
> >> sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
> >> Emporium website (htt
fixed.
Daryl
On 8/13/2006 4:19 AM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm).
Brief direc
On 8/13/2006 10:14 PM, DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/13/2006 4:49 PM, DAve wrote:
Chainsaws, couldn't live without 'em. I hope all you lost were trees.
For the most part. Still trying to figure out how I'm going to cut up
one of the trees that is 23 feet in diameter, which c
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/13/2006 4:49 PM, DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://w
channel update will fail) since the file doesn't pass a --lint test if
the SPF plugin isn't enabled. I've sent mail to Bob about this. I'm
hoping that he adds the missing ifplugin lines soon. See SA bug 5044.
Bob's been REAL busy lately on his day job, but we're hoping he will get a
little b
On 8/13/2006 4:49 PM, DAve wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm).
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm).
Ya stole my thunder. I just came in
Hello all,
For those of you interested in SpamAssassin's sa-update, I've created
sa-update channels for all of the rules found at the SpamAssassin Rules
Emporium website (http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm).
Brief directions for use are as follows:
- download the channels
36 matches
Mail list logo
