On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:29:17 -0700
L A Walsh wrote:
> 1) Is it too much effort to only use the major/minor for sa-files?
>
>i.e. instead of numbering: "3.002000/ 3.004000/ 3.004004/" using
>"3.002/ 3.004/" ...? Where the patch level was guaranteed not
> to cause some "incompat"
I believe if you install a version of sa yourself from a tar, you will see
they use a .raw file without the Perl hardcoded. It is then relaxed at
install time.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 20:29 L A Walsh wrote:
> Putting the questions/wants 1st, for those wanting the bottom line.
> For backstory/why,
Putting the questions/wants 1st, for those wanting the bottom line.
For backstory/why, see further on.
2 things:
1) Is it too much effort to only use the major/minor for sa-files?
i.e. instead of numbering: "3.002000/ 3.004000/ 3.004004/" using
"3.002/ 3.004/" ...? Where the patch leve
