sin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-learn on dedicated spamabuse email account
Oenus Tech Services wrote:
> Yes, but this would not work with our more than 1500 customers that have
> only pop3 access and do not have access to any shared or private folder
> in the servers. We needed to implement s
Oenus Tech Services wrote:
Yes, but this would not work with our more than 1500 customers that have
only pop3 access and do not have access to any shared or private folder
in the servers. We needed to implement some way for these pop3-only
customers to report spam back to us, and for now we've on
You have described why it wont work as good. Using your method the
headers become useless - bayes ill learn only the body/subject content.
You would need to tell bayes to ignore the headers.
With pop3 you only have the option you describe - this may still work ok?
Pete
Oenus Tech Services wro
Thanks, Peter
Yes, but this would not work with our more than 1500 customers that have
only pop3 access and do not have access to any shared or private folder
in the servers. We needed to implement some way for these pop3-only
customers to report spam back to us, and for now we've only thought of
See attach python script written by one of the folks on the MailScanner
list.
Its designed for use with exchange, so i will describe the Exchange
usage and you can modify as you see fit to work on your pop3 server.
In Exchange 2003 create a public folder called SPAM, give everyone
contributo
Hi there!
Most of our email is delivered through pop3, so right now bayes
filtering is off. Nevertheless Spamassassin is doing a good job
filtering email, but we want to setup a way for our customers to report
to us undetected spam by forwarding that spam to an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] account in our ser
