Re: RBLs (was: sa-learn explained)

On Friday, December 29, 2006, 1:25:10 PM, Larry Nedry wrote: > On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: >>What are you using? > Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the RBLs that I > have tried have had too many false positives to be useful for my > requirements. > Whic

Re: sa-learn explained

essage- > From: snowcrash+spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:11:17 -0500 > To: "Phil Barnett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: sa-learn explained > > > > Perhaps it's not ready for prime time. I can't imagine that if it was they &g

Re: sa-learn explained

t, 30 Dec 2006 03:11:17 -0500 To: "Phil Barnett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sa-learn explained > > Perhaps it's not ready for prime time. I can't imagine that if it was they > > would not be making it headline news. > > linford has, apparently, state

Re: sa-learn explained

Perhaps it's not ready for prime time. I can't imagine that if it was they would not be making it headline news. linford has, apparently, stated in posts to newgroups that folks should switch _now_. i think there's a reference in this list's archive, iirc. public announcements, i'd guess, will

Re: sa-learn explained

On Friday 29 December 2006 23:55, snowcrash+spamassassin wrote: > and this, > > http://www.spamhaus.org/zen > > "Caution: zen.spamhaus.org replaces sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. > > If you are currently using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org you can now replace > 'sbl-xbl' with 'zen' (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org will eventua

Re: sa-learn explained

and this, http://www.spamhaus.org/zen "Caution: zen.spamhaus.org replaces sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. If you are currently using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org you can now replace 'sbl-xbl' with 'zen' (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org will eventually become obsolete and may in the future be withdrawn from service). zen.s

Re: sa-learn explained

On Friday 29 December 2006 16:23, Duane Hill wrote: > Phil Barnett wrote: > > On Friday 29 December 2006 14:50, Vernon Webb wrote: > >> What are you using? > > > > Right now, I'm using sbl-xbl. > > I could be mistaken. sbl-xbl is being replaced by zen.spamhaus.org. That > is what I'm currently usi

Re: RBLs (was: sa-learn explained)

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Larry Nedry wrote: > On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: > >What are you using? > > Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the RBLs > that I have tried have had too many false positives to be useful > for my requirements. > > Which RBLs do the r

Re: RBLs (was: sa-learn explained)

On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: >What are you using? Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the RBLs that I have tried have had too many false positives to be useful for my requirements. Which RBLs do the rest of you folks feel comfortable using? Nedry

Re: sa-learn explained

Phil Barnett wrote: On Friday 29 December 2006 14:50, Vernon Webb wrote: What are you using? Right now, I'm using sbl-xbl. I could be mistaken. sbl-xbl is being replaced by zen.spamhaus.org. That is what I'm currently using.

Re: sa-learn explained

On Friday 29 December 2006 14:50, Vernon Webb wrote: > What are you using? Right now, I'm using sbl-xbl. -- My other computer is your Windows machine

Re: sa-learn explained

006 13:47:33 -0600 Subject: Re: sa-learn explained > On 12/29/06 at 12:09 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: > >Yes, ORDB-RBL & SBL+XBL > > FWIW, relays.ordb.org no longer exists: > <http://ordb.org/news/?id=38> > > Nedry > > -- > This message has been sc

Re: sa-learn explained

On 12/29/06 at 12:09 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote: >Yes, ORDB-RBL & SBL+XBL FWIW, relays.ordb.org no longer exists: Nedry

RE: sa-learn explained

To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: sa-learn explained Dave Koontz wrote: > > I guess milage varies. Auto-Learn has been a life saver for us and > has drastically reduced false postives we used to get with emails to > our College's Health Care & Research departme

Re: sa-learn explained

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:17 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: sa-learn explained On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:51:05 -0500, Andy Figueroa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I still fee like a tyro with SpamAssassin, but my installation is catching better th

Re: sa-learn explained

Vernon Webb wrote: Yesterday someone asked if I used sa-learn and the response to myself was, I have something else to learn. Can someone explain to me how to use it? If I understand correctly sa-learn can be used to train SA to recognize certain messages as SPAM or HAM. I've run the sa-learn

Re: sa-learn explained

> My first question would be: > Have you installed Rules Du Jour and set it up to have comprehensive > coverage? > Is pyzor, razor and DCC running? Yes > Are you using an RBL? Yes, ORDB-RBL & SBL+XBL

Re: sa-learn explained

On Friday 29 December 2006 08:23, Vernon Webb wrote: > These guys are beginning to > drive me nuts and obvioulsy I have something wrong as others are telling me > these are being caught as SPAM on their systems. My first question would be: Have you installed Rules Du Jour and set it up to have c

RE: sa-learn explained

27;good' email. I'd suggest that everyone should at least try it and monitor the results. -Original Message- From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:17 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: sa-learn explained On Fri, 29

Re: sa-learn explained

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:51:05 -0500, Andy Figueroa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I still fee like a tyro with SpamAssassin, but my installation is >catching better than 99% with perhaps 0.1% false positives (thanks in >large part to things I've learned from this list), and I think I can >tell you

Re: sa-learn explained

I still fee like a tyro with SpamAssassin, but my installation is catching better than 99% with perhaps 0.1% false positives (thanks in large part to things I've learned from this list), and I think I can tell you a couple of things better than just read the manual. (But, do read the manual!)

RE: sa-learn explained

man sa-learn -Original Message- From: Vernon Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 2:24 PM To: SpamAssassin Subject: sa-learn explained Yesterday someone asked if I used sa-learn and the response to myself was, I have something else to learn. Can someone

Re: sa-learn explained

Hi On Friday 29 December 2006 14:23, Vernon Webb wrote: > Yesterday someone asked if I used sa-learn and the response to myself was, > I have something else to learn. Can someone explain to me how to use it? man sa-learn sa-learn [options] [file]... As I know sa-learn takes nearly every email-for

sa-learn explained

Yesterday someone asked if I used sa-learn and the response to myself was, I have something else to learn. Can someone explain to me how to use it? If I understand correctly sa-learn can be used to train SA to recognize certain messages as SPAM or HAM. I've run the sa-learn command but it is no