Steven Manross wrote:
> Along those same lines, is the message limit of 250K with or without
> attachments?
That's raw message size, including attachments, encoding, and everything else.
Spamc isn't even aware of attachments, so it just looks at the whole message
size.
Along those same lines, is the message limit of 250K with or without
attachments?
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:56 PM
To: Jim Maul
Cc: Ingo Reinhart; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-learn and big
Jim Maul wrote:
> Ingo Reinhart wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> If I commit a big mail (32 MB) to sa-learn it need long time. I must
>> wait 50 sec. and the sa-learn process need 332 MB RAM.
>>
>> What can I do for faster proceed?
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> um..since messages over 250k (default) wont be
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
Hello!
If I commit a big mail (32 MB) to sa-learn it need long time. I must
wait 50 sec. and the sa-learn process need 332 MB RAM.
What can I do for faster proceed?
Ingo
um..since messages over 250k (default) wont be scanned by SA, why bother
sa-learning anything over this
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
> Hello!
>
> If I commit a big mail (32 MB) to sa-learn it need long time. I must
> wait 50 sec. and the sa-learn process need 332 MB RAM.
>
> What can I do for faster proceed?
>
Don't commit such a large message to sa-learn?
Seriously, sa-learn isn't designed to handle su
From: "Ingo Reinhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello!
>
> If I commit a big mail (32 MB) to sa-learn it need long time. I must wait
50
> sec. and the sa-learn process need 332 MB RAM.
>
> What can I do for faster proceed?
In procmail the incantation is something like:
:0 fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 2
Hello!
If I commit a big mail (32 MB) to sa-learn it need long time. I must wait 50
sec. and the sa-learn process need 332 MB RAM.
What can I do for faster proceed?
Ingo
