Dave Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>> (who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
>
>
> Actually, I'm told it's used a lot for windoze services (active dir?)
Ok, who that actually uses a real DNS server. :)
Dave Stern wrote:
As to the format spamc -d 1.2.3.4,10 2.3.4.5,10
That was from a google search. I believe that allows you to specify
timeouts
per host rather than a more universal "-t".
I'm not aware of that being valid.
In any case, anything beyond a single host would either not fail to
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dave Stern wrote:
I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
consistantly working.
Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
handle
a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
[snip..]
> (who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
The 800 Lb Gorilla of Redmond. ;)
Most modern Kerberos clients will use them to find KDCs
if properly set up.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College
Dave Stern wrote:
> I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
> consistantly working.
>
> Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
> handle
> a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
> (Don't
> ask)
>
> What I'd like
I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
consistantly working.
Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't handle
a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally. (Don't
ask)
What I'd like to do is have a call in their .pr
