Hmmm... I think I'm close here!
Thanks for the tip about procmail, and I was delighted to find that my
system not only has procmail already installed but there was even an
active - APPARENTLY active! - ~/.procmailrc ... that even already had
Spam Assassin setup in it?! Nice!
Here's what
s. blah-blah-blah... sorry
for the digression.
The reason for posting is ultimately that the above denoted directive
was working fine as I was trying to rebuild things - namely:
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
But at some point as I made some edits, SA continues to work, and
h
On 2023-03-01 at 02:52:10 UTC-0500 (Wed, 1 Mar 2023 08:52:10 +0100)
David Bürgin
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole:
If your mailstore uses mbox or Maildir, the unmaintained antique
software
named "procmail" could be used for delivery. As an antique myself, I
use it,
but I cannot in good cons
Bill Cole:
> If your mailstore uses mbox or Maildir, the unmaintained antique software
> named "procmail" could be used for delivery. As an antique myself, I use it,
> but I cannot in good conscience recommend anyone else adopt it de novo.
It looks like procmail is maintained again, by the origina
n/.
The reason for posting is ultimately that the above denoted directive
was working fine as I was trying to rebuild things - namely:
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
But at some point as I made some edits, SA continues to work, and
honors everything else in the file so far as I have noted s
ore).
(We now backup /var and EVERYTHING in /! ... Good advice, now that disk
space is dirt cheap!)
The reason for posting is ultimately that the above denoted directive was
working fine as I was trying to rebuild things - namely:
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
But at some point as I made so
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrot
> On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>> I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
>> spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
>> if so, should I do somethin
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
most probably, yes.
However, not by your bayes, unless
Silly question or not, here goes:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and if so,
should I do something to prevent it?
--
Palvelin.fi Hostmaster
postmas...@palvelin.fi
I think using procmail might be the best solution, giving me more control
without having to go through support at the hosting company.
--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Jake Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by S
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by Spamassassin. It gives SA a
*copy* of the message, then puts the SA headers from the copy into the
main message. This has the effect of ignoring any SA-modified headers,
like the subject. Notably,
I'm using a domain hosting service that uses exim for mail. I have little
control other than through user_prefs file and can't change the local.cf file.
In fact, I can't even find it when I look in /etc.
spamassassin --lint:
[12158] warn: config: could not find site rules directory
check: no l
u run spamassassin --lint, to make sure it has nothing to say?
pbr pbr wrote:
> SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 is running and in my user_prefs file I have:
>
> rewrite_header subject [SPAM]
>
> Spam comes tagged from the main configuration and my user_prefs can't
> override it.
>
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 is running and in my user_prefs file I have:
rewrite_header subject [SPAM]
Spam comes tagged from the main configuration and my user_prefs can't override
it.
I've tested other values my user_prefs (such as white-listing spam) and they
seem to work so I
Jason Haar wrote:
Dave Richardson wrote:
Running spamd 3.1.7 on FC3. using qmail-scanner 2.01.
Headers reflect that I AM loading spamd with the desired config
file... (I've changed require_score in small increments and headers
reflect correct value)
spamassassin --lint reports no errors
Dave Richardson wrote:
> Running spamd 3.1.7 on FC3. using qmail-scanner 2.01.
>
> Headers reflect that I AM loading spamd with the desired config
> file... (I've changed require_score in small increments and headers
> reflect correct value)
> spamassassin --lint reports no errors
Please read th
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:12:55PM -0500, Dave Richardson wrote:
> Running spamd 3.1.7 on FC3. using qmail-scanner 2.01.
> BUT rewrite_header isn't having desired change! HELP!??
Since you're using a third-party daemon, they may have their own way to markup
headers. I would check the appropriat
score 5.8
rewrite_header subject [SPAM]
report_safe 0
use_pyzor 0
use_razor2 1
skip_rbl_checks 0
rbl_timeout 3
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 2
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_path /home/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes
score DRUGS_ERECTILE 31.0
I receive header "X-S
Tony Guadagno wrote:
> I see, yes, I am calling SA directly, no Amavis etc involved..
>
>
> > > > Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/21/2006 9:37 am >>>
> Tony Guadagno wrote:
> > I guess i don't understand, you say that "Rewriting the subject is
> > ultimately the responsibility of the MTA.", b
I see, yes, I am calling SA directly, no Amavis etc involved..
***
Tony Guadagno
Guadagno Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
585.703.6700
***
>>> Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/21/2006 9:37 am >>>
Tony Guadagno
Tony Guadagno wrote:
> I guess i don't understand, you say that "Rewriting the subject is
> ultimately the responsibility of the MTA.", but SA has this option,
> so that means that it is SA's responsibility...right?
It depends on how you call it. If you call SA directly, then yes, it does
the m
Sietse van Zanen:
> That is version 2.x config.
>
> -Sietse
>
>
>
> From: Fettke, Dirk
> Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 16:03
> To: Tony Guadagno
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: AW: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I don
-Sietse
From: Tony Guadagno
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 15:45
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
Hi,
I have been reading and I don't see my problem exactly. This is my local.cf
I am using 3.1.7 I have report_safe =1 and the rewrite_h
That is version 2.x config.
-Sietse
From: Fettke, Dirk
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 16:03
To: Tony Guadagno
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: AW: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
Hi,
I don't know if this works with your solution because I do subject-rewriting in
CORE_)
# report briefly, recommended for report_header==1 (default=0)
use_terse_report 0
Regards
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tony Guadagno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 15:46
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Help! rewrite_h
Rewriting the subject is ultimately the responsibility of the MTA.
So, question is:
What MTA are you using and how does it link SA?
-Sietse
From: Tony Guadagno
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 15:45
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
Hi,
I have
Tony Guadagno wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been reading and I don't see my problem exactly. This is my
> local.cf I am using 3.1.7 I have report_safe =1 and the rewrite_header set.
> from the docs "For the Subject header, this will be prepended to the original
> subject." the problem i have is th
ot prepended to the original subject, it
replaces it. I have an example below. Why? What am I missing here?
rbl_timeout 15
fold_headers1
report_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
required_score 5
use_auto_whitelist 1
rewrite_header Subject
Hi,
I have been reading and I don't see my problem exactly. This is my local.cf
I am using 3.1.7
rbl_timeout 15
fold_headers1
report_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
required_score 5
use_auto_whitelist 1
rewrite_header Su
Hi,
I have been reading and I don't see my problem exactly. This is my local.cf
I am using 3.1.7
rbl_timeout 15
fold_headers1
report_contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
required_score 5
use_auto_whitelist 1
rewrite_header Su
From: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Noc Phibee wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > please a small question but urgent ! :
> >
> > Actually, all spams are Tagged into the subject :
> >rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
> > It'
Noc Phibee wrote:
Hi
please a small question but urgent ! :
Actually, all spams are Tagged into the subject :
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
It's on a relay server ..
Can i pat a different "rewrite_header Subject" speicifed for one domain ?
Exemple:
* => rewr
Hi
please a small question but urgent ! :
Actually, all spams are Tagged into the subject :
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
It's on a relay server ..
Can i pat a different "rewrite_header Subject" speicifed for one domain ?
Exemple:
* => rewrite_header
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
> > rewrite_header subject *SPAM(_SCORE_)*
> >
> > man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf is your friend
>
> For completeness, two caveats apply to this.
>
> 1) the above syntax
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> rewrite_header subject *SPAM(_SCORE_)*
>
> man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf is your friend
For completeness, two caveats apply to this.
1) the above syntax is for SA 3.0.0 or higher. 2.xx won't make sense of it.
2) If you are using a MTA integration
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
a while back, someone mentioned that they had configured SA to modify
the subject to include the SA score like:
*SPAM(10.2)*
Is this easy to do? What is the syntax to acheive this in my local.cf
file?
Regards,
Devin
Hi,
rewrite_header subject
Hello,
a while back, someone mentioned that they had configured SA to modify
the subject to include the SA score like:
*SPAM(10.2)*
Is this easy to do? What is the syntax to acheive this in my local.cf file?
Regards,
Devin
Jason von Nieda wrote:
> Hi all. I'm using SA with rewrite_header Subject globally but
> I need to disable it for one user. I used to use rewrite_subject 1 globally
> and
> rewrite_subject 0 in user_prefs for this user but with 3.0 these are
> deprecated and removed. Can someo
Hi all. I'm using SA with rewrite_header Subject globally but I need to
disable it for one user. I used to use rewrite_subject 1 globally and
rewrite_subject 0 in user_prefs for this user but with 3.0 these are
deprecated and removed. Can someone give me a hint of how to do this now?
I
40 matches
Mail list logo
