> I think I may downgrade the milter as far back as I can and see if that
> fixes it. If it does, then we know that this specific version ignores the
> SA
> local.cf commands to change subject and report safe.
Looks like I may have a different answer. Am testing it now.
> Your maillog paste doesn't show the Subject: header being modified, it
> only shows the X-Spam headers being added. This may be a symptom of the
> '-m' option being present in the call to whatever the spamass-milter
> executable is.
Yes exactly. I see the milter doing *some* work, i.e. adding
Chris Harvey wrote:
The problem with your setup is with spamass-milter, not SpamAssassin.
And people exclusively ask questions about SA on here? Never ever one on the
milter?
Perhaps I should have been a little more verbose -- I wasn't saying not
to ask your question here. It's not a SpamAssassi
Chris,
I'm not running SA on FC3, although I'm using it for other things. I
can verify I've had problems with FC releases and SA previously, most
notably some weird core dumps on a fresh install of FC1 back with SA
2.6. I narrowed it down to an issue with Perl and installed modules,
and if me
> For those of us who use mail clients that understand what headers like
> Thread-Index: AcVAiG7iyfb2TrlzT+CYcsBsxEhNiAAYn8GA
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> mean, replying to a message in a thread to ask a different question means
> that
> we may or may not see your question (as it may be n
On Thursday 14 April 2005 13:12, Chris Harvey typed:
> > guess the people reading that thread don't know about your problem. I'd
> > suggest next time you send a new message (thus starting a new thread)
> > rather than hijacking an existing thread.
>
> Not sure where you are getting that from. I
> The problem with your setup is with spamass-milter, not SpamAssassin.
And people exclusively ask questions about SA on here? Never ever one on the
milter?
> The problem with your lack of responses is that you started your thread
> by replying to a message in the thread titled "--username flag"
The problem with your setup is with spamass-milter, not SpamAssassin.
The problem with your lack of responses is that you started your thread
by replying to a message in the thread titled "--username flag". I
don't know what your problem has to do with the --username option, but I
guess the peo
One month FREE spam and fraud protection at
http://www.cloudmark.com/safetybarsig/?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Harvey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:21 PM
> To: 'SpamAssassin list'
> Subject: RE: report_safe doesn't seem
Anyone else seeing similar behavior!? I cannot find out what is wrong.
If I edit my sensitivity (require_hits) it's reflected in my logs, yet none
of these settings appear to be working:
report_safe 1
rewrite_header Subject **NEW_SPAM(_SCORE_)**
If I put the old settings back of:
rewrite_subjec
> I upgraded to FC3 this last weekend and I just noticed today that the mail
> in my junk folder are not encapsulated/wrapped like they were before.
>
> I checked my config file and have:
>
> required_hits 4.5
> rewrite_header Subject **SPAM(_SCORE_)**
> report_safe 1
> use_bayes 1
>
> So it see
I upgraded to FC3 this last weekend and I just noticed today that the mail
in my junk folder are not encapsulated/wrapped like they were before.
I checked my config file and have:
required_hits 4.5
rewrite_header Subject **SPAM(_SCORE_)**
report_safe 1
use_bayes 1
So it seems ok, but it's defin
12 matches
Mail list logo
