On 10/2/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you using smapc/spamd or plain spamassassin?
> it is spamc/spamd..
OK, so it should be fast enough.
> > And I think there is a way to tell spamassassin to report what tests
> > actually take some time to execute, so you can see where
On 9/29/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have diabled the DNS and URI lookups and Razor/Pyzor/DCC,
> and it still takes around 1x seconds to scan one email, but we have a
> little power supply problem at this moment so I cannot check the
> configuration file, I'll check i
> I think I have diabled the DNS and URI lookups and Razor/Pyzor/DCC,
> and it still takes around 1x seconds to scan one email, but we have a
> little power supply problem at this moment so I cannot check the
> configuration file, I'll check it later.
Are you using smapc/spamd or plain spamassassi
Greetings,
I think I have diabled the DNS and URI lookups and Razor/Pyzor/DCC,
and it still takes around 1x seconds to scan one email, but we have a
little power supply problem at this moment so I cannot check the
configuration file, I'll check it later.
I still think it may be caused by the UTF-
slow spamd scan
"John D. Hardin" writes:
>On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Deephay wrote:
>
>> On 9/28/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
>> > > thing is, SA is i
"John D. Hardin" writes:
>On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Deephay wrote:
>
>> On 9/28/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
>> > > thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
>> > > + Qmail + Qmail-s
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Deephay wrote:
> On 9/28/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
> > > thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
> > > + Qmail + Qmail-scanner). Here's a typical scan
> > 14 seconds may be just the delay for the various network tests to
> > respond.
> You mean the test form SA? I have googled for this kind of situations
> and I found I am the slowest. If I stop the spamd, the delivery will
> be much faster.
I mean it depends how your SA is configured.
Some of
On 9/28/06, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
> thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
> + Qmail + Qmail-scanner). Here's a typical scan log:
>
> result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,siz
> I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
> thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
> + Qmail + Qmail-scanner). Here's a typical scan log:
>
> result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,size=1689 ...
Hi,
Problem is not that it is slow.
Greetings all,
I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
+ Qmail + Qmail-scanner). Here's a typical scan log:
result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,size=1689 ...
.
And I have checked the SA
Greetings all,
I am quite new to SA (a week of SA life), and the SA is working, the
thing is, SA is incredibly slow on my server (2.8GHZ CPU + 2GB Memory
+ Qmail + Qmail-scanner). Here's a typical scan log:
result: . 0 - SPF_PASS scantime=14.7,size=1689 ...
.
And I have checked the SA
12 matches
Mail list logo
