Re: re2c and sare rules

2007-05-06 Thread Josh Trutwin
On Sun, 06 May 2007 13:25:08 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote: > Loren Wilton writes: > > Its a new feature with 3.2. We have to rewrite most of the obfu > > rules to get around this, and none of us have had the time yet. > > more correctly, it's a perl bug, not a new feature in 3.2.

Re: re2c and sare rules

2007-05-06 Thread Justin Mason
Loren Wilton writes: > Its a new feature with 3.2. We have to rewrite most of the obfu rules to > get around this, and none of us have had the time yet. more correctly, it's a perl bug, not a new feature in 3.2.0. --j.

Re: re2c and sare rules

2007-05-05 Thread Loren Wilton
Its a new feature with 3.2. We have to rewrite most of the obfu rules to get around this, and none of us have had the time yet. Loren

re2c and sare rules

2007-05-05 Thread Josh Trutwin
Hi, I installed re2c when I built SA 3.2.0 and uncommented this: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody Then ran: sa-update sa-compile /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart I now notice the following over and over many many times (enough to fill up /var) in mail.log: May 5 21:47:48 ww