opm.blitzed.org is no longer alive:
http://wiki.blitzed.org/OPM_status
I personally have seen a number of false positives using list.dsbl.org with
customers who are on sbc and comcast networks. I would suggest using this list
only if you have opened a RBL-free email submission port 587 for custo
p.net it has many many false positives.
Regards,
Leon Kolchinsky
-Original Message-
From: Quinn Comendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 11:07 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Re: rbl insight and wisdom please
I'm using the following with qmail'
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:42:40PM -0800, R Lists06 wrote:
> Hopefully this hasn't been rehashed to death on this list yet has there ever
> been a general consensus as to which rbl's and similar lists are best to use
> if you are going to engineer your mail systems with such?
>
> Anyone care to sh
Well I'll be darned...you're right. Zen uses CBL.
Q
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:50:47 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Did you know that zen uses cbl anyway?
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:06:58 -0800, Quinn Comendant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm using the following with qmail's rblsmtpd:
>
>-r zen.spamhaus.org
>-r bl.spamcop.net
>-r relays.ordb.org
>-r cbl.abuseat.org
>
>I do find it very hard to determine if a list is "malfunctioning" and honest
>emails
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I'm using the following with qmail's rblsmtpd:
-r zen.spamhaus.org
-r bl.spamcop.net
-r relays.ordb.org
-r cbl.abuseat.org
I believe the abuseat.org list is incorporated into the zen.spamhaus
list. At least it was with the sbl-xbl and xbl lists.
I do find it very har
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Quinn Comendant wrote:
> I'm using the following with qmail's rblsmtpd:
>
> -r zen.spamhaus.org
> -r bl.spamcop.net
> -r relays.ordb.org
> -r cbl.abuseat.org
Agreed except for spamcop - a lot of people have a low opinion of
their trustworthiness as an all-or-nothing RBL.
--
I'm using the following with qmail's rblsmtpd:
-r zen.spamhaus.org
-r bl.spamcop.net
-r relays.ordb.org
-r cbl.abuseat.org
I do find it very hard to determine if a list is "malfunctioning" and honest
emails are blocked until clients start complaining. It has happened before with
me using other
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:42:40 -0800, "R Lists06" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hopefully this hasn't been rehashed to death on this list yet has there ever
>been a general consensus as to which rbl's and similar lists are best to use
>if you are going to engineer your mail systems with such?
>
>Anyon
Hopefully this hasn't been rehashed to death on this list yet has there ever
been a general consensus as to which rbl's and similar lists are best to use
if you are going to engineer your mail systems with such?
Anyone care to share their implementations as well as current best and worst
practices
10 matches
Mail list logo
