pinoyskull schrieb:
Matthias Haegele wrote:
pinoyskull schrieb:
will it be ok if i have 1000+ spam learned and only 300+ ham learned,
will it still be effective?
Dont know. But i think it´s better if you learn *all* spam and ham ...
that's my problem, spams overwhelmed ham on our server
(If
> -Original Message-
> From: pinoyskull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 9:55 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: question about bayes database
>
> > (If your "spam-ham-ratio" is really that bad perhaps y
Matthias Haegele wrote:
pinoyskull schrieb:
will it be ok if i have 1000+ spam learned and only 300+ ham learned,
will it still be effective?
Dont know. But i think it´s better if you learn *all* spam and ham ...
that's my problem, spams overwhelmed ham on our server
(If your "spam-ham-ratio
pinoyskull schrieb:
will it be ok if i have 1000+ spam learned and only 300+ ham learned,
will it still be effective?
Dont know. But i think it´s better if you learn *all* spam and ham ...
(If your "spam-ham-ratio" is really that bad perhaps you want to use
some "MTA-level" antispam, or blackl
will it be ok if i have 1000+ spam learned and only
300+ ham learned, will it still be effective?