Re[2]: question about bayes and awl.

Hello Matías, Friday, February 11, 2005, 10:29:13 AM, you wrote: >> It sounds to me like you're training a central Bayes database, while >> the users are using their individual databases. >> >> Individual databases are better (non-spam to the business department >> may look like spam to the bio-

Re: question about bayes and awl.

Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 19:29 schrieb Matias Lopez Bergero: > Hi, > > I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the > bayes db and the awl db. > I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user > there is an .spamassassin directory, storing Baye

Re: question about bayes and awl.

Robert Menschel wrote: Hello Matias, Thursday, February 10, 2005, 10:29:08 AM, you wrote: MLB> The bayes and awl db are working only for the user who owns them right? MLB> What about the bayes data created with the sa-learn command? MLB> I'm being training spamassassin Bayesian filter since the ins

Re: question about bayes and awl.

Hello Matias, Thursday, February 10, 2005, 10:29:08 AM, you wrote: MLB> Hi, MLB> I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the MLB> bayes db and the awl db. MLB> I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user MLB> there is an .spamassassin director

question about bayes and awl.

Hi, I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the bayes db and the awl db. I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user there is an .spamassassin directory, storing Bayesian and awl databases a part from the user preferences file. The bayes and