martin smith wrote:
> I had a rule I was working on, it works on the example u pasted, be
> interested if this works, if not if you could send me a sample to
> work on.
> Use at your own risk has I havent checked it that well for FP's
Martin,
I checked your rule for FPs for you, the results are:
U
ent: 31 May 2005 17:45
M>To: Robert Menschel
M>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
M>Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
M>
M>Robert
M>
M>just got one in - no matches...
M>
M>If anyone wants an example let me know..
M>
M>--
M>Martin Hepworth
Ok just got a spam an
M>From: Martin Hepworth
M>Sent: 31 May 2005 17:45
M>To: Robert Menschel
M>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
M>Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
M>
M>Robert
M>
M>just got one in - no matches...
M>
M>If anyone wants an example let me know..
M>
M>--
M>Mart
-- Original Message -
j> From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
j> To:
j> Sent: 2005 May, 31, Tuesday 02:45
j> Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
>> Oops - spamassassin --lint barfed all over these new rules. Most of
>> their names were ov
-Original Message-
M>From: Martin Hepworth
M>Sent: 31 May 2005 17:45
M>To: Robert Menschel
M>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
M>Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
M>
M>Robert
M>
M>just got one in - no matches...
M>
M>If anyone wants an example let m
M>-Original Message-
M>From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>Sent: 31 May 2005 17:45
M>To: Robert Menschel
M>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
M>Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
M>
M>Robert
M>
M>just got one in - no matches...
M>
M>If a
Robert
just got one in - no matches...
If anyone wants an example let me know..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Martin,
Friday, May 27, 2005, 3:52:25 AM, you wrote:
MH> Hi
MH> I've been attempting to get t
UTHCHOKING_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_CARISOPRODOL' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_LEVITRA_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_VOLLGESPRITZT_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_FLEXTRA_SUBJ' is over
artin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SpamAssassin Users"
Sent: 2005 May, 31, Tuesday 02:35
Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
Bob
Ta - I've upgraded the rules and we'll see how we get on..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid Sta
Seems to be the 99_OBFU_drugs.cf file.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 May, 31, Tuesday 02:45
Subject: Re: problem with split line URL's
> Oops - spamassassin --lint barfed all over these new rules. Most of
>
rning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_BONTRILE_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_MOUTHCHOKING_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_CARISOPRODOL' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_LEVITRA_SUBJ' is over 22 chars
warning: rule 'LOCAL_OBFU_
Oops - spamassassin --lint barfed all over these new rules. Most of
their names were over the character count limit.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SpamAssassin Users"
Sent: 2005 May, 31, Tuesday 02:35
Subject: R
Bob
Ta - I've upgraded the rules and we'll see how we get on..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Martin,
Friday, May 27, 2005, 3:52:25 AM, you wrote:
MH> Hi
MH> I've been attempting to get the split line URL
Hello Martin,
Friday, May 27, 2005, 3:52:25 AM, you wrote:
MH> Hi
MH> I've been attempting to get the split line URL rule working - this one..
I believe the working rule that matches all active spam using this
trick is now active in 70_sare_obfu.cf
Bob Menschel
Loren Wilton wrote:
Which dont seem to trigger the above rule. Any ideas?
Not really. That's my rule and it works fine here, and many other places.
However, you aren't the first to say it doesn't work for them.
I'm guessing you are using something other than procmail/spamd to process
mail,
Loren
ok I've added the alternative in with a slightly different name so I've
got both in the setup.
I note that if I run spamassassin -D < test.eml on an example the rules
don't fire either, so I don't think its MailScanner getting in the way.
Running SA 3.0.3 (from CPAN) with perl 5.8.5 (
> Which dont seem to trigger the above rule. Any ideas?
Not really. That's my rule and it works fine here, and many other places.
However, you aren't the first to say it doesn't work for them.
I'm guessing you are using something other than procmail/spamd to process
mail, or maybe you are runnin
Hi
I've been attempting to get the split line URL rule working - this one..
rawbody __LW_URI_CR1 /href=\"[^"]*\r[^\n]/is
full __LW_URI_CR2 /href=\"[^"]*\r[^\n]/is
meta LW_URI_CR __LW_URI_CR1 || __LW_URI_CR2
score LW_URI_CR 2
describe LW_URI_CR unescaped cr in uri
I get quite a few spams
18 matches
Mail list logo
