Re: problem with shortcircuit

2008-05-20 Thread Michael Geiger
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb: On 20.05.08 12:06, Michael Geiger wrote: Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa installation (3.2.4)! shortcircuiting is not as easy as it seems. Many kinds of different checks are run in parallel, some are run before others. To get shor

Re: problem with shortcircuit

2008-05-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.05.08 12:06, Michael Geiger wrote: > Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa > installation (3.2.4)! shortcircuiting is not as easy as it seems. Many kinds of different checks are run in parallel, some are run before others. To get shortcircuit working, you must incr

problem with shortcircuit

2008-05-20 Thread Michael Geiger
Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa installation (3.2.4)! I have defined in local.cf: header MAILMAN ALL =~ /-(bounces|confirm|join|leave|request|subscribe|unsubscribe)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i describeMAILMAN Mailman whitelisted shortcircuitMAILMAN