On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:06:11PM +, Nix wrote:
>> An interesting technique that allows a program (such as a log writer)
>> to run as an unprivileged user, while receiving privileged data. (taken
>> almost verbatim from Gerrit Pape's socklog)
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> exec > exec 2>&1
>> exec softl
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, George Georgalis announced authoritatively:
> Here's what I'm doing that is broken. I use tcpserver (functionally
> similar to inetd) to receive an incoming smtp connection. While the
> smtp session is still open, the message is piped to a temp file which
> is then scanned for s
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:19:53 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
> >>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
> >>> I recall a problem a while
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
>>> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
>>> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
>>> use
falseys
rm "$tmp"
exit 31
;;
*) # spamc error,
echo "$0 error, spamc exit $sce"
exit 71
esac
exit 81 # Internal bug
>If you can reproduce it consistently, *please* report
>this to the linux-kernel list!
I did, but have had no response to my
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
> user uid. The fix was to run the logging program as
> root. Has that protected pipe method been extended
> since 2.6.8.1?
The enti
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:53:58PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 04:40 PM 3/3/2005, George Georgalis wrote:
>>This log entry indicates when I booted into 2.6.11:
>>2005-03-02 12:05:47.018334500 2005-03-02 17:05:47 [781] i: server killed
>>by SIGTERM, shutting down
>
>Is there any chance you're ru
At 04:40 PM 3/3/2005, George Georgalis wrote:
This log entry indicates when I booted into 2.6.11:
2005-03-02 12:05:47.018334500 2005-03-02 17:05:47 [781] i: server killed
by SIGTERM, shutting down
Is there any chance you're running out of memory and the OOM killer is
kicking in and sending SIGTER
Is anyone successfully runing SA on a 2.6.11 linux kernel?
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:16:03 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
>> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
>> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:16:03 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
>> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
>> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa
>> but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail +
>>
I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa
but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail +
QMAIL_QUEUE.
I don't really have time to break down an analysis,
but I'm fairly certain. If an
11 matches
Mail list logo
